hydrashok

joined 2 years ago
[–] hydrashok 7 points 1 month ago

I was going to say SNES Mario Kart, but really I think it’s GC Mario Kart: Double Dash.

[–] hydrashok 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Spoiler alert: No.

See also, Betteridge’s Law of Headlines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

[–] hydrashok 6 points 1 month ago

In other news, just like the post office, the US military continues losing billions per day. They just spend it on salaries and equipment! What idiots!

/s

[–] hydrashok 6 points 1 month ago

ALL HANDS ABANDON MEME! REPEAT, ALL HANDS ABANDON MEME!

[–] hydrashok 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are you just trying to bait me or are you actually interested in a conversation? I’m happy to discuss further, but right now I feel like your goal is just to rile me up for internet points.

[–] hydrashok 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally almost every technological advancement we have today is because someone was trying to figure out how to kill someone more efficiently. From the slingshot and bronze sword all the way up to nuclear weapons and stealth planes. It’s not a boomer concept at all (nor am I one), and it surely will not be limited to that generation. See also: drone warfare, using aviation tactics very similar to WW1. What is old is new again.

You say “we live in modern times” like that somehow precludes our primitive tendencies, but that’s just ignorance, in my opinion. It’s like a beauty pageant contestant wanting world peace. It is a wonderful aspirational goal, but it’s not exactly realistic, either.

[–] hydrashok 5 points 1 month ago

Cars are like onions; they make you cry.

[–] hydrashok 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sadly, war fuels a lot of innovation, and it’s been that way for thousands of years. While I don’t like war and wish people could just live and let live, yes, we will need people to run the manufacturing lines, companies to mine and refine the raw materials, etc. Many of those lines were running minimally, if at all, because we already had the warehouse of old stuff. Now that we don’t (or at least have less), there’s room for more. And that in turn will provide the money for those companies to develop better weapons. Again, nothing really new. It’s a tale as old as time.

[–] hydrashok 5 points 1 month ago

He’s is gonna go right to the front!

I’m on the Williams/Sainz/Albon hype train and I don’t want to leave. I’m honestly really excited at the turnaround Williams is having under Vowles and how it could shake up the grid. They seem to be making all the right moves lately, and with a new title sponsor, they’ll have money to develop and ideally not spend it on car repairs.

[–] hydrashok 9 points 1 month ago (13 children)

“Completely humiliate Russia by giving Ukraine our old stuff sitting on shelves that costs us basically nothing but the shipping to Europe; not risking any of our soldiers; restarting munitions production lines to refill our stock with new, even better weapons that fuels US job growth and innovation” should be enough already. The amount we’ve given Ukraine is less than just a few days cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns. It’s like the deal of the millennium. We should be sending Ukraine everything we can.

[–] hydrashok 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I bet she lives in Canada, too. Eh?

/s

[–] hydrashok 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s Steam Deck verified. Install Steam and Proton and go for it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›