this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

World News

35248 readers
570 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Giving 50% of all future profits is quite harsh but the first 50% until 750bn+ and NATO membership actually quite a good deal for both sides.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

US has already explicitly ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine. It's not going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That’s because there’s no actual intention to protect Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Certainly weird that Biden provided arms to Ukraine but prevented them from using them in Russian territory. It does seem like all the US has done is surrender Ukraine slowly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

There is nothing weird about the US not wanting to be directly at war with Russia actually. What's weird is that people in the west wholeheartedly supported this proxy war in which the west was cynically using Ukraine to fight Russia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

As kissinger said, its . Much more lethal to be Americas friend than its enemy.

Exactly as in 2014, ukraine can get better deal from Russia than west. The only reason west will support ukraine is to funnel weapons to support terrorism against new russia.

Deal is aweful to accept for Ukraine, and only zelensky corruption could result in it.