hellothere

Simp E O Simp E O

I mean, this is so over the top, but I kinda love it as an idea.

How dare they fail my champ like that!

I've spoken to them twice, no issues and very happy with the service both times.

First time was due to a website bug when the FP4 was released and 16 orders went through and were charged to my card. All cancelled and refunded with no delays.

Second time was due to an issue with a fairbud, which had to be sent away for repair, and again was very easy.

Yeah. Sure.

Super stupid bought a five cent bag...

Thanks!

The idea that Farage could ever be PM is laughable.

If come 2029 it looked like a realistic possibility then the level of tactical voting and vote swapping across Lab, LD, and Greens would be even more than 2024.

If Reform ever get more than 25-30 seats I'll do a Paddy Ashdown and eat my hat.

Starmer has always felt to me like there is two versions of him. The stuff he as A Person believes and values - which is best displayed through his work before politics - and Starmer, The Politician, who understands that to change things you must first be in power.

The Person is well documented through his legal career, clearly someone who values human rights, due process, is against the death penalty, has no problem with prosecuting celebrities and politicians, etc. If he never entered parliament, I doubt anyone could claim he's a tory.

But as Starmer, The Politician, it's clear he's willing to modify what he says and offers as a platform depending on the audience. He isn't a populist - clearly - but it would be denial to claim his platform hasn't changed between winning the Labour leadership, and the 2024 general election. I think it's pretty obvious that he adopted a platform he thought would win the leadership, and then switched to one that would win at a general election.

What interests me is how much of The Person remains behind the moderation of The Politician.

Reading the 2024 manifesto, there is a lot of good Labour policy in there. Removing the VAT exemption on private schools is not really a financial decision (as it is being presented by The Politician) but a values judgement that rich people should not get subsidies for luxury goods or services. The same goes for non-doms.

I also think there is a thread of that thinking in the winter fuel payment decision. I absolutely think setting the bar at pension credit is too low, but people like my parents who have workplace pensions in addition to state absolutely do not need to be given hundreds of pounds a year to help with bills they can already easily afford.

The same also goes for landowners complaining about no longer paying diddly squat inheritance tax on land. Is the line too low? Possibly. Is the principle wrong? Absolutely not.

See also lords reform, nationalisation of the railways, infrastructure investment, decarbonising electricity, and a bunch of other stuff.

But if you look at how The Politician talks about a lot of this stuff, it is absolutely presented in ways which are clearly aimed at the Daily Mail, etc. How successful that strategy will be over time will be interested - and I suspect is flawed - but the actions really do matter more than the words.

That is not to say that I think everything is perfect, I don't. I continue to be a trustee and volunteer at my local foodbank because of the system still being fundamentally broken, and I don't think The Politician will be the person to fix that. But, I do think some progress is being made in some areas.

Fair points, well made.

Oh totally, completely agree that there are many upsides on the newer classes.

My point was more on carbon emitted during manufacture specifically and if, for the sake of a noddy example, if that was more or less than running existing stock for 15 more years.

I have no idea, what that tipping point would be, and it feels like trimode may inadvertently facilitate further can kicking as running on battery is still better than diesel.

But maybe this is me wanting perfect instead of good.

I get it will take years, but we also just keep kicking the can further and further down the road.

We adopted 25kv in the 50s, but short term decisions by successive governments has meant that we electricifed barely 250 miles of track between 97 and 2019.

Given the operational life of an engine can realistically be many decades long, I do wonder what the carbon cost of manufacturing new tri-mode engines would be, compared to continuing to run old stock over the same time period, presuming a significant increase in the speed of electrification.