Yeah, but if they're in a sufficiently abstracted industry, the domino chain of failing petit bourgeoise will sustain them until retirement. Especially when you've already got enough to live comfortably, might as well squeeze as much juice out as possible, quarter by quarter. The aftermath is someone else's problem.
Time: 2 weeks, take home
Questions: 1, multiple parts.
Open textbook, internet, collaboration with classmates, anything really.
Good luck
You're cutting the head off the hydra at that point.
That and also rampant corruption. You can only do so much within the system when the system is rotten.
Correct.
Scientists CAN prove unequivocally that the earth is a globe, there is no uncertainty and it is not an hypothesis.
Could be a weird confluence of spatial anomalies perfectly mimicking a "globe" to our tests. That's not very likely at all, but it's a non-zero uncertainty.
Science can't "prove" anything. It is more accurate to say that it reduces the level of uncertainty of hypotheses, but that uncertainty can never be reduced to exactly zero.
Kissing a bearded man rarely results in hair in your teeth
But when homo erectus started standing upright, butts weren't so universally erotic anymore.
This is where you lost me.
Gaslight Obstruct (Mercator) Project
Walz was the best part of that ticket, up until they muzzled him. He was surprisingly popular across party lines, I don't see anyone else who accomplishes that. The campaign failed despite him, not because of him. I don't agree with anyone saying he's a bad pick because the Harris campaign was a failure. He'd be an excellent, effective choice.
But siblings and nieces/nephews are generationally distinct. "-ibling" evokes to me a generational parallel. I would sooner accept it as a synonym for cousin. I don't disagree with the utility of such a word, but I don't care for that word used for this purpose.