afarensiis

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In footballing terms only, that's the part I have trouble with. I think he probably did it because I believe the women, and I really want him out of the club, but I'm never sure what a club should do in these situations. If they suspended him the second the accusations came forward, he would have been out of the club for a year and a half now with no end in sight. If the investigation is never dropped, but the police don't have enough evidence to charge or drop (at this point), is his career over? Should it be the same for just some random guy that works at a Tesco in Mansfield? He's not allowed to work until the investigation is dropped?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I think that's typically how I define it too. Saka is easily a top 5 RW. Saliba is easily a top 5 CB. Rice is easily a top 5 DM

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I fully accept that Raya is the undisputed #1 for this team, but I would be so happy for Ramsdale if he was given the CL game today. I'm 99% sure it'll be Raya, but I think it would go a long way in showing support and trust in Ramsdale if he gets picked today. And until Ramsdale is fully out of the club, we might still need him if something were to happen to Raya. Showing support for Ramsdale when he's down would go a long way to make sure he's still part of the team

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

We also haven't had a single game with a preferred starting XI. How much have we seen a midfield of Partey, Odegaard, and Rice? A single half against City? Imagine how much ball progression alone would improve with the full team

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They didn't have a single shot for 60 minutes. They generated 1.0 xG with something like 0.7 of it coming from their goal that shouldn't have stood. I don't see a world we lose that game without that decision

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know my opinion isn't universally shared. That's what I'm trying to figure out. Every time I watch the goal I try to see how it isn't a foul and I can't. He used Gabriel's neck as a springboard

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The foul isn't a 50/50 imo. It's so obviously a foul that I honestly can't understand anyone saying otherwise. The ball out of play and the offside are much more 50/50 calls