would that involve getting rid of publicly traded/owned companies? would that in turn mean only one person could own a company and not allow investments?
Willy
joined 1 year ago
it's kind of amazing that campaigns do anything anyway, this election more than ever. what could an ad or a rally convince anyone of at this point?
I mean what don't we eat/ use? I hate to imagine a world with only boneless wings. or not having a ham bone to make soup with after easter. my dogs would miss their dehydrated chicken feet. my stock would miss the chicken backs and necks and etc. shame we can't just raise headless animals.
it's only a lab and science because they are taking notes. after the process is finalized it will be more like a kitchen/factory making yogurt.
Amtrak does go over some bay inlets not that far away, north and south of Edgewood. those would be a little hard to confuse because they are so close to the water though. it pretty neat really.
this is a full change in policy not a cracking down. before this you didn't need to be a member to buy from the food court. I've done it many times, you just tell the card checker you're going to the food court. one location near me has the food court outside the main building just so anyone could use it.
skulls are really flexible when that young. forceps are used and deform skulls. lots of things do at that point, even “normal” birth. they usually bounce back into pretty good shape.
it's small though.
I read it more as an attempt to steer the interviewee into a narrative and he just didn't bite.
geez. save some for the rest of us.
seems like it could be fun
even then, with one person owning a stock or a company, what would stop a person from selling what they considered to be shares why wouldn’t I tell you that you get 100th of only thing if you buy 1/100 of a piece of what I consider to be the value of the company?