TopRamenBinLaden

joined 2 years ago
[–] TopRamenBinLaden 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To add on to what you said, only the lower recievers for most guns have to be registered. Someone could hypothetically get every other upper part for a pistol or rifle delivered directly to their door or PO box with no questions asked, and then just hypothetically 3d print the lower reciever.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fair point. I guess I'm not immune. I was protected from that kind of propaganda by the armor of wise and empathetic family members, and their ability to educate and lead by example.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Some of us do seem to be immune to the propaganda, though. I've heard so much anti-union propaganda. I've heard so much anti-Socialist rhetoric, anti-woke bullshit, etc. I was educated and employed in a red state.

Yet, here I am telling you that Socialism is the truth. Unions are awesome. I support just about any marginalized groups rights. Many of my friends and family feel the same even though they were educated and indoctrinated in the same system.

There is a lot more to it than just propaganda. I would say that tribalism plays a larger role. When someone is born into a conservative family, surrounded by conservative citizens, it becomes a lot easier to just agree with the status quo in the area to fit in. I can tell you, from my experience, that I was not very popular in school, due to being a dirty leftist with empathy.

I will say that my immediate family is not religious, not conservative, and they are very open minded, loving and empathetic people. This is probably the main reason I was immune to the propaganda.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We have places like San Fransisco and New York, with some of the richest people in the whole world regularly walking past homeless encampments. I don't think the structure is the problem. I think it has much more to do with the culture and family they are raised in.

We live in a society that rewards narcissism. Our society tells these rich people that homeless people are only homeless because of bad personal choices.

There is no reward for empathy, besides the positive feeling a healthy person would get from being kind. In fact, being empathetic can be a detriment to being successful, so many upper class families skip that lesson plan on purpose.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This really resonates with me. You are an excellent writer.

The part about empathy is so real. A lack of empathy is a real advantage in today's world, unfortunately. I think empathy should be one of the most important values a society should strive for, and we decided to make a society that rewards sociopathy instead.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Its not illegal, though. I can go out into public right now and say it with no repercussions. If it was illegal, how would anyone possibly inform other people of actual fires and bombs?

The thing that is illegal is causing a panic in a large group of people. Has nothing to do with the words used.

I just feel that the nuance is important. Any combination of words could get you in trouble if it happens to cause a riot.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It was also illegal in 1970 when this strike took place. So, it could still happen.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

This is a common misconception. It's not illegal to say anything like "bomb" or "fire" in a public place, at all.

What you could get charged with in those situations is something like, "inciting a riot", or "disorderly conduct". These depend on how people around you react to your words or actions, but doesn't depend on the actual words used.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think you missed my point, entirely. I wasn't saying that governments committing atrocities in other countries versus their own people were any different, morally speaking.

I was simply pointing out that the quality of life for the working class, and low amount of wealth disparity, etc in this country is largely due to Socialist policies keeping Capitalism in check, and also pointing out that Capitalist policies cause atrocities, in general.

This was in response to the comment saying that countries were hiding atrocities behind the banner of Socialism.

Atrocities of any kind are abhorrent and I agree that they need to be denounced. I also agree with pretty much everything else that you said. Socialism is near dead and dying in Europe. I just think that the sprinkle of Social policies that is left in the EU still holds back Capitalism from being quite as horrible as it could be.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

All of those 'Socialist' governments in the EU, with the highest quality of life, highest quality of happiness, and some of the least wealth disparity in the world, are committing atrocities against their own people?

Some of these governments probably commit atrocities in countries other than their own, but that would be because of Capitalistic and Imperialistic policies, not Socialistic ones.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 4 points 5 months ago

Also worked there. There is no McDonald's that has ever allowed tips. It's against their corporate rules. I even saw an employee get written up for accepting a tip, once.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He was a white collar working class guy. His work history is full of positions at various tech companies working as an engineer. It doesn't appear that he was handed any sort of dynasty.

He was upper class, and he had better opportunities than your average American, but he was still a worker.

view more: ‹ prev next ›