Susaga

joined 1 year ago
[–] Susaga 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm making a campaign set in fantasy Vegas, so I took the floorplan of a casino and made it into a map of the city.

[–] Susaga 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, he definitely looks like someone trying to splinter the left to weaken support, then adding "I'm voting Harris" and "Free Palestine" in the way some republicans say "as a black man..."

[–] Susaga 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please respond to what people say and not what they could have said. Don't respond to phantoms who aren't in the room.

You don't need to think someone is perfect to think someone else is worse. There are lots of people so disillusioned by the left that they don't vote at all, thus allowing the right to come into power, and they need a wake-up call that, yes, things can get worse.

You are protesting genocide in a pro-Palestinian forum, directed as people who are also pro-Palestine, responding to someone saying "let's not make Palestine worse." You're not a nazi (and I never said you were), you're just useless.

[–] Susaga 10 points 1 month ago

Cool. It's not happening here. You're having this conversation non-stop because you keep forcing this conversation when nobody's even talking. Why does the statement "Trump is bad" have to be followed by "Biden is also bad"? Those are two different conversations.

Will voting Harris fix the problem? Probably not. Will not voting Harris make things worse? Yes. Do you want things to be worse, or do you want to vote Harris? Just because she's imperfect doesn't change that.

It's a shitty thing to strawman someone to condemn them for things they haven't said. Telling someone not to do a shit thing is not a shit thing.

I am pro-Palestine, anti-Trump, and I think American politics is too right-wing overall. I just don't think "Biden is causing a genocide" is a good response to "Trump would actively make things worse."

[–] Susaga 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Once again, what the fuck conversation are you responding to? If you don't disagree with what they said, that Trump is worse than Biden, why are you spending so much time arguing with them? Please note that they never said Biden was GOOD, just that Trump was WORSE.

nobody thinks trump would be better for Palestinians besides people who ... don’t vote

So, aside from the people who think that, nobody thinks that? Helpful. Do you think they're maybe not voting because they think Trump can't be any worse?

Please fuck off with your strawmanning OP into a person saying things they definitely didn't say. Fuck off with your false assertion that we criticise Trump because we love Biden. Fuck off with your "I'm not a russian spy" assertion when nobody ever called you one. Fuck off with your constant smug spamming of the Palestinian flag as if we aren't on the same fucking side.

You're not just preaching to the choir, you're calling the choir blasphemers and heretics. If you're going to respond to someone, please respond to what they said, and not what you think they could have said.

[–] Susaga 31 points 1 month ago (14 children)

The only thing they said is "Trump is worse than Biden." You yourself agreed with that. So why are you demonising them for things they haven't said?

Honestly, the fact you're reacting so strongly to a post calling Trump worse than Biden by saying "liberals coming here to do their pissy whataboutism" makes you sound like a Trump supporter trying to take shots at the other side without even realising that Biden ISN'T EVEN RUNNING.

[–] Susaga 41 points 1 month ago (20 children)

What the fuck conversation are YOU responding to? Cause it's sure as hell not the one you posted in.

[–] Susaga 13 points 1 month ago

Think of "trickle down economics" as a human centipede. The guy in front of you gets to eat whatever he wants. You get to eat shit. The only people in support of it are the people who think they could be in the front of the chain, either because they were born there or because they're idiots.

[–] Susaga 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every so called “undecided”

You mean "Republicans." They won't admit it, because it's a terrible thing to be, but that's the only reason you could possibly think Trump isn't an instant "vote for the other guy" candidate.

There is no way you can look between a piece of cake and a piece of shit and not instantly go for the cake unless you have a scat fetish. You're not fooling anyone by pretending you're undecided; we know you just want to eat the shit. Either that, or you're really, REALLY bad at noticing a piece of shit when you see one.

[–] Susaga 8 points 1 month ago

Depends on what's being adapted. Some things benefit from a longer run time to cover all the good stuff, while other things benefit from a lot of the guff being cut and the story streamlined.

[–] Susaga 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Read your question back. What did YOU call them? Yeah, that's what they're called.

[–] Susaga 2 points 1 month ago

Slander is spoken. Written, it's libel.

And there's a difference between libel and stating facts about someone that they don't like. I can't say for certain which those tweets are, especially since I can't actually read them right now.

view more: ‹ prev next ›