MyEdgyAlt

joined 1 year ago
[–] MyEdgyAlt 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And yet here is another source with a different photo recently, so there’s no reason to think this tweet’s photo is deceptive:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-ear-bandage-shooting-b2586901.html

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump attends Turning Point Action's The Believers Summit 2024 in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., July 26, 2024 (REUTERS)

It looks entirely consistent.

[–] MyEdgyAlt 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you’d actually watched the videos you’d have seen blood on the way to the ground; something definitely hit his ear.

[–] MyEdgyAlt -2 points 3 weeks ago

Well then they’d have been occupiers’ human shields. So while probably not the primary target, per Israeli policy they’d be perfectly legitimate military targets. Human shields and unrelated collateral damage are perfectly acceptable to the apartheid occupiers.

[–] MyEdgyAlt 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

This feels misleading.

Vance made it clear, said Aaron Fritschner, deputy chief of staff for Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), "that he meant no disrespect to cats, but he did mean to demean women and still holds the view in 2024 that they should be punished for not having children."

So the actual quote here is from a chief of staff of a Democratic representative, not from dolphin-loving couch-loving JD Vance. So it’s an accusation that interprets for us. And the tweet the article cites heavily edits the text it quotes:

"Obviously it was a sarcastic comment. I’ve got nothing against cats. ... People are focusing so much on the sarcasm and not on the substance … and the substance of what I said, Megyn — I’m sorry, it is true."

Heres a video of the clip without the editing: https://therecount.com/watch/obviously-it-was-a-sarcastic/2645895762

Ok, so the edits here at least aren’t misleading..

Then based on the 9 minute clip of her show in the original article, it seems like he’s claiming the substance is not about the cat lady comment, but some lies about what Democrats believe about families (democrats think kids are for the economy, republicans want to make it easier for women to stay in the workforce (I mean, is there a more blatant lie than that? They’re the ones who fight against extending COVID-era childcare credits!), etc). That’s what says he’s doubling down on. And given the context that does truly seem to be the lies he’s doubling down on.

Let’s try to stick to sincere, defensible attacks against people for whom there are many valid attacks, and not spread misleading claims that JD is doubling down on “crazy cat ladies”. He’s shit and we can demonstrate that in good faith, or we can lie like he does.

[–] MyEdgyAlt 41 points 4 weeks ago (14 children)
[–] MyEdgyAlt 21 points 1 month ago

Genocidal terrorists sure are whiny when called out on it.

In posts and comments on LinkedIn, Ms Carey had described Israel as a “terrorist state” and criticised the “indiscriminate” bombing of Gaza by Israel.

Wix’s chief operating officer and president Nir Zohar said last year that the company had decided to part ways with Ms Carey after it had been bombarded with messages from Israeli employees who had complained about Ms Carey through screenshots of her post.

[–] MyEdgyAlt 82 points 1 month ago

Hey now if that was the reason that would mean the Israelis are racist, but they’re the most moral country in the world. So surely it couldn’t that!

[–] MyEdgyAlt 12 points 1 month ago

I don’t want to be held responsible for the appalling actions of my government, but as a voter I understand why people in other countries would. I have more control over it than they do, so them influencing me influences my government.

[–] MyEdgyAlt 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (21 children)

It doesn’t say they’re excluding all Jewish people, it says they’re excluding Israelis. You know, people from the country where they all serve in the military, except the most extreme religious extremists (for now anyway), the country actively violating international law in the West Bank and actively committing genocide.

There are plenty of non-Israeli Jewish people. Non-Zionist Jews are lovely people and should not be excluded.

This is the same as refusing to do business with apartheid South Africans.

[–] MyEdgyAlt 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is a totally credible and easily verified source, thanks for the effort to inform us 🙄

So I did some research, and: Moskowitz (D-FL) – Amendment No. 45 – Prohibits funds appropriated by this act to be made available for the State Department to cite statistics obtained from the Gaza Health Ministry as well as this

Here’s a reaction to it.

It is true. Ugh.

view more: ‹ prev next ›