Can't violate human rights if they are sub-human

You can introduce interoperability. I am on X. I can't go to Bluesky. Let's say that Elon Musk decides to block me because I said something he didn't like. He has blocked me before for a couple of weeks. Now, I have more than a million followers on X. I cannot leave without losing them. If I go to Bluesky, I have 10 followers. Interoperability would mean that if I go to another platform, to Bluesky, when I post something on Bluesky, then my 1 million followers on X can hear it.

Sounds like Fediverse's ActivityPub

Sounds like the UAC from Doom (2016).

Java is looking more and more cool.

Too bad companies are still stuck on Java 8😔

Since everyone else before me is too mature:

They made it for your mom

Nathaniel Chapman, a designer who has worked at both Blizzard and Obsidian, also added: "The slow grind on something you do not believe in is 10x as soul crushing as crunching for something you care about."

I felt that

It's probably a feature, not a bug.

See: Dark Pattern (to be specific, Roach Motel)

The conspiracy theory that there's a small group of evil, rich people controlling the world keeps getting validated.

They can simply count which products are being sold more / run out of stock more quickly.

(But I get that they probably bought into the hype of AI)

Maybe the real monsters are the people we met along the way.

Learn to use the 3 sacred treasures of conversation from Yumiella (Villainess Level 99):