DarthRedLeader

Well, you see, I want to be able to persecute others because that's, like, the foundation of my religion. But it doesn't really feel right because I end up feeling like the instigator. So I go out looking for reasons I'm being persecuted against so I can sleep at night after a good long day of playing the victim and retaliatory persecuting others.

And that basically explains masks and the rest of the garbage the right yells about.

I think you should do you and browse whatever you want. I still use Reddit when looking for opinions on products and services because there's nothing close to the discussion on there. But visiting the site (without an adblocker) 100% still generates ad revenue and is what matters to ad companies, regardless of actually participating in the discussion.

I had to click a link to another article that had the link to the video on Twitter 🙄

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1681424737384435713?s=20

I think that's reasonable. As bullish as my response was, in the end, we all have our priorities and I think its's totally fair to value convenience as long as you understand what that convenience really means. Taking mitigations to get your news using platforms that don't rely on algorithms to provide what will delight or infuriate you is a step in the right direction.

In my opinion is that the issue is feeding data into a monolith that knows you better than you know yourself. The amount of data they have for everyone allows them to create profiles and find similarities that can predict proclivities that you don't know about yet.

There's nothing wrong about enjoying the conveniences of being recommended things you're interested in, but this also means that they can sugeest things you didn't even know you wanted (and probably wouldn't have ever have wanted.

Combine that with the fact that this doesn't just stop at product placement. It becomes all to easy for a malicious company to feed you news and opinion meant to make you feel a certain way or sway your opinion. It gives corporations way too much power over the thoughts and opinions you have on a day-to-day basis and makes you powerless against them.

And before you say, "I'm a smart, well-rounded person and would not be susceptible to those things," literally everyone is susceptible. There's no outsmarting them if you play their game. The only way to win is through digital privacy.

It's all personal preference. There's certainly pros and cons to both. I think Tildes tends to have more in-depth and thoughtful conversation than what I've seen on Lemmy so far.

There's docs that details the Philosophy if you want to take a look. I'm personally interested in both for different reasons.

I feel like defederating is a good short term solution, but the events described with XMPP could have happened in any number of ways.

The real focus should be on how to make ActivityPub robust enough to prevent the events from the article from happening again.

You 100% can. That's exactly how I have mine set up. It clears cookies on exit but then I manage a whitelist.

Here are the Chrome instructions. Firefox is more or less the same.

https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/95647?hl=en&co=GENIE.Platform=Desktop#zippy=%2Callow-or-block-cookies-for-a-specific-site

Tbf, there's a difference between knowing instinctively that someone poops and being first-hand witness to the godawful stench of post-chipotle bowel movement in an area with poor air circulation (AC aside).

Crush is definitely involved though.

I don't know why I keep forgetting about the upcoming IPO, but the point about investors is definitely a good one. I do agree that whatever happens, this is a huge signal that Reddit admins have fallen out of favor with their userbase, which is certainly not tenable for functional company.

Honestly, I'd be shocked if Huffman is still CEO in 6 months.

Thanks, I was missing that point of view but I see what you mean.

I guess the way I see it is that, right now, people are enthusiastically joining in, which is still driving a sense of community. I guess I'm not as convinced that, long term, people will be driven to make new communities. I feel like the more likely scenario is that people will grow bored and go back to their normal, everyday posting.

Edit: I do agree the invester point is definitely one I didn't consider and is definitely a huge factor to all of this. Of course, it goes without saying that it at least signals the turmoil at Reddit and brings more attention to it. Not all press is good press in this case.

Whatever happens, I fully intend to sit back and enjoy watching the drama unfold.

I think these malicious compliance subreddit responses are as fun as the next person, but honest question: doesn't this work out in Reddit's favor? They don't care what's posted as long as content is being generated and traffic being driven to their site, right?