As long as the cost of breaking a law is less than the cost of complying, American businesses will choose breaking the law every single time.
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
356 points (99.2% liked)
News
23435 readers
2752 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
American governments often fail to realise that they literally hold all the cards. At any time they can dissolve or threaten to dissolve a company for flagrantly disregarding the law, and yet this rarely happens.
In fact the opposite is true. Since Citizen's United allowed unlimited ~~bribery~~ political donations, companies hold all the cards. Unlimited funding and advertising can make or break most any candidate's chances for election, especially in purple areas.
Believe me when I say that a dissolved company can't fundraise shit.
Explain please, exactly who's going to do the dissolving? The same government representatives who are controlled via donations by that corporation? Wishful thinking doesn't make it so.
On Wednesday, a ProPublica investigation traced how a Michigan company would not pay for an FDA-approved cancer medication for a patient, Forrest VanPatten, even though a state law requires insurers to cover cancer drugs. That expensive treatment offered VanPatten his only chance for survival. The father of two died at the age 50, still battling the insurer for access to the therapy. Regulators never intervened.
Land of the free*.
*As long as we can fleece you.
My mother-in-law's sister survived cancer once. Years later, she started feeling pain and worried that the cancer had come back. Her insurance company repeatedly denied basic scans/tests to see if the cancer had returned.
My wife's cousins finally got sick of all this and paid out of their own pockets for the tests. She had cancer again. Only by this point, it had spread. It was in the base of her tongue and was blocking her throat. They had to remove her tongue, but that didn't stop the cancer. She eventually passed away.
Would she have survived if the insurance company approved the tests in the beginning? There's no way to guarantee this, but she would definitely have had a better shot at survival.
But at least the insurance company saved some money, right? Isn't that the most important thing? 😡
Oops. My bad, there. I changed the law. — the health insurance company.
This news story has come out every few years for decades now. Nothing has changed.
Wait, what!?!