this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
765 points (94.6% liked)

memes

9351 readers
2358 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 116 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Close, but 2000s had some very intrusive and malware ridden advertisements. Popups everywhere, aggressive banners, malware and random browser toolbars being installed to your system. Complete wild west of unrestrained advertising. Online ad blocking didn't start with Ublock Origin, the first tipping point was in the 90s and 2000s, where famously clean and effective search engine Google swooped in to "save us" with their Chrome browser blocking popups by default, and their own concept of 'ethical ads', which were mostly unobtrusive and text-based (what happened there?). Which was nice for a while before Google exploited the popularity that bought them to turn into an inescapable ad monster.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

before Google exploited the popularity

A classic example of enshittification stage 1 and 2, for those unfamiliar with the term.

[–] mindbleach 1 points 9 months ago

Right: browsers ignored the HTML standard, to kill pop-up windows. Straight-up decided that meeting spec was not worthwhile because the spec was stupid.

Now we just get annoying Javascript flyovers when you scroll down the page.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In the year 2000, an internet friend gave me FTP credentials to a directory on his domain so I could host images and post them on the forum we were friends on.

He provided this service to all the forum users because we were all like :woah: when he started posting images that weren't just leeched from another domain.

Eventually he did ask users throw him a few bucks, and then he made a tutorial on how to get your own domain and do it yourself.

Which tells me I've been using filezilla for about 2/3 of my life.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

I rented a web server with FTP in college, with my own domain that used my real name. I used it to transfer files to and from school computers. My classmates would sometimes forget their USB drives and think they just wasted a whole 3 hour lab session, and I would just quickly create some credentials for them and let them use my server. Everyone thought I was a god lol. These days, services like Google Drive have replaced the need for that (mostly), and everyone just takes it for granted. I think it's funny that people are starting to see value in FTP again now that services like Google Drive and Discord are restricting the ability to use them for free hosting to post files onto external sites.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What are you talking about, ads were far worse back in the 90s /2000. Were you even using the Internet back then? Couldn't block them and things like infinite pop ups were rampant, if you didn't have a firewall setup and anti virus, your entire Windows 98 setup could be wrecked in minutes just being online

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago

You are the millionth visitor! Click here to redeem your prize!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Again, the meme is not about the internet in 2000s. It is just about people sharing out of fun vs. "creators" wanting to monetize every little shit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's just such a common misconception that there was no ads in the 'old Internet', that's all I was pointing out. There seems to be a nostalgic false memory that Internet back then didn't have ads which is hilarious if you were there to see what it was like

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (2 children)

People seem to forget that before YouTube partnered with content creators people just kinda... uploaded stuff that they were passionate about. They didn't do it for a living and they did not expect payment but might have asked for donations if their channel was costly to run. Sure, the production value and editing quality was a lot lower, but the core experience was still the same.

This is why I flatly reject the notion that me blocking ads on YouTube hurts content creators in any meaningful way, especially now that almost all of them are partnered with some kind of sponsor embedded in the video.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The core experience was definitely not the same, what are you talking about? Yeah sure if you just wanted entertainment maybe, but educational content for example requires so much research and double checking that it wouldn't be possible without ad money.

I'm not saying that blocking ads makes you a bad person (I did it too before I could afford premium), but it does have a measurable effect and pretending it doesn't is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Yeah sure if you just wanted entertainment maybe, but educational content for example requires so much research and double checking that it wouldn’t be possible without ad money.

Research did not begin when YouTube started paying people to upload to their platform. It was already being done. It might be more accessible to people who only do YouTube and do not get grant money for their research, but saying research wouldn't be possible without ad money is nonsense.

Also, adding a financial incentive to upload as many videos as possible to get as many clicks and views as possible doesn't sound like the way you encourage truthful, factual, and well-researched educational content to get shared. If anything, it would encourage a lot of low effort clickbait, misleading titles and thumbnails, opinion pieces, "edutainment" and poorly sourced material mass produced for a wide audience. Not saying that's what happened, I'm sure there are plenty of channels that exist now thanks in part to ad revenue helping them get started and/or continue posting at regular upload intervals, but the Cobra Effect is real and people will always be finding ways to take the path of least resistance to getting their payout.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I still use it that way. Any time ive had a problem that wasn't adequately explained by youtube or elsewhere, if I solved it myself, Id make a simple YT tutorial for it and upload it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

pays for own domain/no ads

There is a 0% chance you were an adult in the early 2000s lol

Imagine having ads in things but instead of just being there, they opened in new windows, were loud as fuck, and opened by the hundreds. That's what the Internet was like

Pop up blockers walked so ad blockers could run.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

There is a 0% chance you were an adult in the early 2000s lol

I'm 49, dude. And the meme isn't about "the internet". It is literally about the difference between people sharing stuff back then and "creating content" today. Shitty internet parts have always been shitty, but at least people didn't try to monetize even their beloved ones' death.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

The kids are nostalgic for a time they didn’t experience!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (12 children)

There is a 0% chance you knew how to use internet back then it seems.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I sometimes thought about opening a personal blog or something on the domain I own anyway (mostly to test Hugo).

But then again, when was the last time you read a personal blog? If you want anybody to the see your stuff you’ve got to be on instagram or something.

[–] Daefsdeda 11 points 9 months ago

The problem is how would I ever find out about it, except when posted on instagram etc. will people find out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I do when its posted to something like Lemmy or Hacker News, if the things you're posting would interest those kinds of communities you'd at least have a small audience

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The difference is that you own everything on your blog, but insta owns everything you post, and may save it forever.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The weirdo content creators on Newgrounds and eBaum's World were still better than 90% of content creators that exist now.

Hell, many of those same content creators are the 10% of the not-shit YouTube creators now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The animations and videos on Newgrounds definitely contributed to many awakenings for teenage me.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Use SponsorBlock for the "content creator"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just don't use YT. I'm not interested on stuff there. I much prefer blogs or the likes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

People need to bring back cheesy personal websites, banners and forum signatures...

There are still some corners online where you can find and make those, even if you don't have the money, time or knowledge to host one yourself. For example:

Neocities (yes it's like Geocities)

I am obsessed with those sites. It's like the internet back in the day when I was a teen. I hope the social media and content creator sludge never overcomes it...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

"Normal guy in 2000"

as someone who was into computers and in high school in 2000, that that was not normal.

even if yo mean normal computer literate person, not even then... Most people did not run their own servers, was it more common, yeah, but it wasn't a given.

Things were only free if you were into piracy, everything cost money though without as much marketing, but then it wasn't a huge market...

Also ads were everywhere and worse...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

We had geocities and angelfire

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

We have pop-up blockers now--we didn't then.

Ads could take over your screen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I considered myself a pretty "normal guy" back then and paid my domain/hosting and had a hand-written HTML+js blog/website with no ads... And plenty of "normal people" used to do that, even if it was a much smaller percentage of internetizens than nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Shameless plug nx2.site (it has no ads, but also unfortunately no real content)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like the different colors on load! I need to figure how to do this article links with the border and rounded corners

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

It's just a bunch of nested divs 😅 one colorful and one black

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It's not all black and white though. People in the 2000's didn't know that you can make a living off content creation, but people who have adopted this style usually can and will (or should) turn more effort into creating high quality videos.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Isn't that exactly the point of the meme? Internet 20 years ago was about sharing mostly. Internet today is about monetization mostly. And content quality isn't what makes you big, it's your ability to game/abuse the system

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"High quality" can come in the form of investing time into research, or creating visual aids that present information clearly. But it also often manifests as flashy title cards, pointless special effects, derivative humor (like frenzied jump cuts to movie clips and memes every few seconds), unnecessarily rambling intros, superfluous wall-to-wall music. I feel like many of these features are borrowed over from classical TV, to give the veneer of a highly produced "professional" product, when democratized internet media's greatest strength is to actually free us from these conventions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah can't argue about that. Unfortunately there are numerous amount of livelihood content creators who are making these clickbaity, mind numbing videos like ssniperwolf.

[–] nehal3m 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Understandable association but I'm not one. Only content I'm making is some memes in a Lemmy community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those poor people who grew up without trying monetise everything

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

We made a geocities page as a group project and the teacher thought we were geniuses.

load more comments
view more: next ›