Big losers. Lousy pieces of shit losers.
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
19 points (74.4% liked)
Conservative
483 readers
109 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
all 32 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
Shitty rappers too. Your party is a joke and it’s just criminals and the mentally insane.
Seriously, as much as end up voting for them, they keep shooting themselves in the foot.
I want them to do better, or at least make way for a better option.
they keep shooting themselves in the foot.
You mean like with abortion policy, or gun policy, or made up culture war bullshit, or the fascism?
[deleted]
Whether you agree with policy is independent of whether or not it is bad strategy.
All you're saying here is that you agree with shooting yourself in your foot.
That is my right and is needed with the violent democrats.
It's actually republicans that make up the larger share of domestic terrorism. Your fears are misplaced.
[deleted]
Looks like you didn't do your homework, because you're either lying or hopelessly misinformed.
Domestic terrorism:
City/state level:
https://www.salon.com/2023/02/15/like-to-talk-tough-on--but-theyre-the-ones-with-a-real-problem/
https://www.thirdway.org/report/the-two-decade-red-state-murder-problem
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/30/murder-rates-democrat-republican-states-gun-control
https://www.planetizen.com/blogs/122113-red-cities-blue-cities-and-crime
Prison:
You also need to learn a thing or two about the difference between correlation and causation.
[deleted]
I am not sure why you are citing so many things irrelevant to the conversation
All of these things I've cited are in fact revelant to which side is more violent.
Domestic terrorism has little to do
But it does have to do with which side is more violent.
The red states’ murder problem are in gasp democrat-run cities.
You're so close to understanding. Try just a little bit harder.
Perhaps, maybe, just maybe being surrounded by red could have an impact on cities. It's almost like cities have limited options when the red state they are in actively makes it impossible to handle crime.
Keep up claiming that correlation is causation and you'll stay just as misinformed as you are right now.
Look at the top cities for murder rate and only 1 is a republican led city.
Correlation does not imply causation.
Now what is relevant is more criminals are democrats.
Correlation does not imply causation.
And I already addressed this, and with a more factual, less biased news source:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prison-legal-news-pln-bias/
And not only that, but post-prison reporting is by far the worst version of these stats to pull, as it only makes the problem of correlation/causation worse.
Has it ever occurred to you that post prison, they might register democrat because democrats are the only ones advocating for prisoners to be treated humanely? Whereas republicans are glad to treat people as animals. You're not looking at the right data.
[deleted]
It isn’t relevant as it has nothing to do with what was stated. It’s word vomit.
You literally said "That is my right and is needed with the violent democrats."
The topic is the violence of each group. Therefore right wing domestic terrorism (which is larger than left wing domestic terrorism) is therefore relevant.
The cities are responsible for their own crime.
Cities do not exist in a vacuum. It is not a closed system.
People are not driving from the burbs to shoot people in the city.
I never said otherwise. My point is that guns being easily accessible in rural regions makes guns easily accessible in urban regions. Cities do not exist in a vacuum, and gun law can generally only ever be as strong as the weakest nearby region.
And on top of that, correlation does not imply causation. So simply stating "democrat cities violent" doesn't tell you jack shit. You need to be looking at the actual causes, and political leanings ain't it.
As I cited most felons are democrats. It’s a well known fact.
Now you're just burying your head in the sand. I gave you a better source than your own, from actual prisoners instead of ex prisoners. You're well known fact is complete horseshit. The biggest political group in prison is republicans.
[deleted]
Yes, and your response was just word vomit.
This is just word vomit.
It tells you a lot. I avoid Democrat cities for that reason. I don’t need the added crime and violence in my life. Move to a Republican area and you don’t have to deal with such things.
This is also just word vomit.
You have yet to prove it false.
Then you didn't read the above links.
[deleted]
Yes, I read your irrelevant links
You very clearly did not.
Maybe you should take some time to focus and have a point rather than just word-vomiting the party line.
It is pretty clear. Not sure why you are having an issue reading it.
It is well-known democrats are more prone to mental illness and violence. Why do you think that is?
It is actually republicans, not democrats that have that problem.
[deleted]
The last time I did cite a source you just ignored it, so what's the point?
[deleted]
It was pretty clear. Not sure why you are having an issue reading it.
Nice loaded question you got there.
How dare they directly address the biggest issues with the party
It's an open ended question. Do you not have an answer?
It implies things are true. Its a basic manipulation tactic.
I mean all of the things I listed are some of the reasons why so many people vote against republicans. It is in fact all true.
But I was wondering if there was a particular reason you thought so.
You're arguing in bad faith. I'm not going to anwser such an obvious loaded question.
No, I am genuinely wondering how you of all people think the republican party is failing.