Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
All of these things I've cited are in fact revelant to which side is more violent.
But it does have to do with which side is more violent.
You're so close to understanding. Try just a little bit harder.
Perhaps, maybe, just maybe being surrounded by red could have an impact on cities. It's almost like cities have limited options when the red state they are in actively makes it impossible to handle crime.
Keep up claiming that correlation is causation and you'll stay just as misinformed as you are right now.
Correlation does not imply causation.
Correlation does not imply causation.
And I already addressed this, and with a more factual, less biased news source:
https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2020/aug/1/survey-8000-prisoners-political-views-finds-surprising-results/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prison-legal-news-pln-bias/
And not only that, but post-prison reporting is by far the worst version of these stats to pull, as it only makes the problem of correlation/causation worse.
Has it ever occurred to you that post prison, they might register democrat because democrats are the only ones advocating for prisoners to be treated humanely? Whereas republicans are glad to treat people as animals. You're not looking at the right data.
You literally said "That is my right and is needed with the violent democrats."
The topic is the violence of each group. Therefore right wing domestic terrorism (which is larger than left wing domestic terrorism) is therefore relevant.
Cities do not exist in a vacuum. It is not a closed system.
I never said otherwise. My point is that guns being easily accessible in rural regions makes guns easily accessible in urban regions. Cities do not exist in a vacuum, and gun law can generally only ever be as strong as the weakest nearby region.
And on top of that, correlation does not imply causation. So simply stating "democrat cities violent" doesn't tell you jack shit. You need to be looking at the actual causes, and political leanings ain't it.
Now you're just burying your head in the sand. I gave you a better source than your own, from actual prisoners instead of ex prisoners. You're well known fact is complete horseshit. The biggest political group in prison is republicans.
This is just word vomit.
This is also just word vomit.
Then you didn't read the above links.
You very clearly did not.
It is pretty clear. Not sure why you are having an issue reading it.
It is actually republicans, not democrats that have that problem.
The last time I did cite a source you just ignored it, so what's the point?
It was pretty clear. Not sure why you are having an issue reading it.