this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
19 points (74.4% liked)

Conservative

404 readers
45 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It isn’t relevant as it has nothing to do with what was stated. It’s word vomit.

You literally said "That is my right and is needed with the violent democrats."

The topic is the violence of each group. Therefore right wing domestic terrorism (which is larger than left wing domestic terrorism) is therefore relevant.

The cities are responsible for their own crime.

Cities do not exist in a vacuum. It is not a closed system.

People are not driving from the burbs to shoot people in the city.

I never said otherwise. My point is that guns being easily accessible in rural regions makes guns easily accessible in urban regions. Cities do not exist in a vacuum, and gun law can generally only ever be as strong as the weakest nearby region.

And on top of that, correlation does not imply causation. So simply stating "democrat cities violent" doesn't tell you jack shit. You need to be looking at the actual causes, and political leanings ain't it.

As I cited most felons are democrats. It’s a well known fact.

Now you're just burying your head in the sand. I gave you a better source than your own, from actual prisoners instead of ex prisoners. You're well known fact is complete horseshit. The biggest political group in prison is republicans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You literally said “That is my right and is needed with the violent democrats.”

Yes, and your response was just word vomit.

My point is that guns being easily accessible in rural regions makes guns easily accessible in urban regions. Yet in the rest of the state we are doing just fine. So obviously, the problem isn't availability. since most of them are Democrats, the obvious answer is violent Democrats seek our weapons to commit violent crimes.

So simply stating “democrat cities violent” doesn’t tell you jackshit

It tells you a lot. I avoid Democrat cities for that reason. I don't need the added crime and violence in my life. Move to a Republican area and you don't have to deal with such things.

You’re well known fact is complete horseshit.

The well known fact is true. More felons are democrats. You have yet to prove it false. You just threw word vomit talking about everything but the fact that democrats are more prone to criminal behavior.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and your response was just word vomit.

This is just word vomit.

It tells you a lot. I avoid Democrat cities for that reason. I don’t need the added crime and violence in my life. Move to a Republican area and you don’t have to deal with such things.

This is also just word vomit.

You have yet to prove it false.

Then you didn't read the above links.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I read your irrelevant links. That is how I knew they were irrelevant.

Maybe you should take some time to focus and have a point rather than just word-vomiting the party line.

It is well-known democrats are more prone to mental illness and violence. Why do you think that is?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, I read your irrelevant links

You very clearly did not.

Maybe you should take some time to focus and have a point rather than just word-vomiting the party line.

It is pretty clear. Not sure why you are having an issue reading it.

It is well-known democrats are more prone to mental illness and violence. Why do you think that is?

It is actually republicans, not democrats that have that problem.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cite where conservatives are more prone to mental illness. You’re obviously acting in bad faith because no study has ever shown that to be true

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The last time I did cite a source you just ignored it, so what's the point?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have to cite something relevant. You can’t cite random word vomit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was pretty clear. Not sure why you are having an issue reading it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Keep trolling.