this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
263 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19125 readers
4167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A bill introduced by House Republicans on Monday would provide $14 billion in funding for Israel, but do it in a way that helps the rich avoid taxes. As a result, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office now predicts the proposal would add nearly $27 billion to the national debt.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"We can kill brown kids, give the rich a tax cut, and help Russia.... It's all coming together" -The GOP

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If only there was a way they could incorporate the oppression or objectification of women and the LGBTQ community....😢 /s

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An increase to the deficit that Republicans will then use as justification for further cuts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Only for poor people and the environment, of course.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Honestly, if this doesn't pass, then the IRS doesn't getting defunded, and Israel gets less ammo for it's genocide. I think I'm alright with this.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These guys seem like some real jerks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I'm starting to think a few of them may be a bit disingenuous.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm glad someone did the math. Because the IRS funding was how Democrats paid for part of the Inflation Reduction Act, and that was as scored by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Seems like getting rid of that funding shouldn't also be a way to pay for Israel money.

There's no rule against just doing two things and not paying for it (other than they promised they wouldn't), I just hate that it was being framed as a pay-for. It obviously is not, and everyone impartial to the politics would tell you that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If you add two negatives you get a positive!!!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Don't pass it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is as republican stained as it looks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Warmed up tea party BS still smells the same.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So $13 billion for the rich?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you defund it they will coom.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

What does Israel need?