this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
87 points (93.9% liked)

World News

32047 readers
649 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The submarines will use a combat system by US defence company Lockheed Martin Corp and carry US-made torpedoes.

Admiral Huang Shu-kuang, Ms Tsai's security adviser, described the submarines as a "strategic deterrent" that could also help maintain the island's "lifeline" to the Pacific by keeping ports along Taiwan's eastern coast open.

China openly ridiculed Taiwanese hopes for what the submarines could do to defend the island.

“No matter how many weapons the Democratic Progressive Party buys, it will not obstruct the greater trend of reunification with the motherland,” said Senior Colonel Wu Qian, a spokesperson in China's Ministry of National Defense.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

China: Your submarine is stupid and you look awful in that light.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

*West Taiwan

they're gonna get real mad if you use the wrong name xd

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago
[–] merc 1 points 11 months ago

This looks like a standard utility / attack sub, but I wonder if it could be used as a blockade runner / merchant sub if China tried to blockade Taiwan. It wouldn't do much good for shipping bulk goods like food in, but you wouldn't need much cargo capacity to ship out high value, small size things like the chips made by TSMC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Probably depends on locale. Definitely doesn't match what I see

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Headline A/B testing will show multiple headlines to different users before settling to the one with most engagement

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Ye, doesn't match on mine as well.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

China's... not so wrong with this one. Under the previous KMT government, Taiwan-China relations were normalizing (not to the degree of reunification, but to the degree that conflict wasn't really on the horizon anymore because of the economic harm it would cause). The DPP has taken a strongly anti-China stance and the result has been escalating tensions... All while bilateral trade across the strait continues to grow.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Yeah... I wonder why Taiwanese people would choose a heavily Anti China party? you knowz the superpower that wants to invade them and strip them of their democracy, specially just like they did with HongKong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Things are tense because China is encroaching on Taiwan's sovereignty. Don't try to say it's Taiwan's fault because they haven't been able to avert the desires of their suitor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Encroaching on Taiwan's sovereignty by flying in international airspace over international waters?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, encroaching on Taiwan's sovereignty by claiming that Taiwan is a province of China and exerting pressure on other sovereign nations to adopt that position.

I'm honestly intrigued by your comments. I'm trying to figure out whether it's possible to sincerely believe the things you're saying. I think it's much more likely that you're promoting an ideology through misrepresentations - I'm just a little surprised that Lemmy would be a fertile platform for that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Have you picked up a history book? Taiwan literally still claims mainland China and the South China Sea as ROC territory. Maybe read Taiwan's Constitution instead of the American media interpretation of it? It's not my fault that you seem happier to spread ideology with American interpretations than deal with actual facts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It's reasonable for any country to be "anti-china" when they are being targeted like Taiwan is. China speaks constantly of invasion and frequently violates Taiwans airspace for practice runs of an invasion. Spinning it as Taiwans fault is mindless propaganda

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

me violating "Taiwan's" airspace when I throw a paper airplane out of the window in Wenzhou, lmao

Also Taiwan isn't recognized as a country by pretty much ...anyone. No one in BRICS+, in the Global South, hell even no one in the international-community-1international-community-2 recognizes the island's "independence". Calling it an "encroachment on sovereignty" is like calling me trifling through my German-made refrigerator looking for noms a "violation of German sovereignty".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Sigh - you are not throwing paper airplanes over the Taiwan strait which is roughly 100 miles over the water. Please educate yourself on what China's military is doing. And do you think some poll on who sides with China VS Taiwan on sovereignty matters is relevant?

Taiwan strongly rejects reunification, Chinese rule, and increasingly view themselves as Taiwanese. Why dont you consider their aspirations instead of enabling authoritarian countries to harass and intimidate?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

And yet, under the KMT government relations were normalizing. In the past, mainland China had extremely positive rhetoric towards Taiwan (and Taiwan towards mainland China). Even today, trade grows and cultural coupling grows.

Frankly, claiming that China violates Taiwan's airspace shows a gross misunderstanding of international aviation law. American FONOPs in the area since 2016 have broken the status quo that the Chinese and Taiwanese governments were using to split the strait: if the strait is international waters outside of the 12km limit, then the air above it is international airspace by definition.

Oddly enough, that timeline also coincides with Taiwan's government flipping from KMT rule to DPP rule.