I think personally that we should just give it time. We don't need to attract everyone and we've already got a lot of work to do.
I personally believe that what we have today is enough to serve as a battery for organic, natural growth through word of mouth. We just need to keep going and convince people through genuine effort that we can do better as a platform.
Most sane answer. Let the haters hate. You probably won’t convince them otherwise
Not only do we not need to attract everyone, we cannot attract everyone. At least not short to mid term. If everybody on reddit suddenly jumped on the lemmy bandwagon, the whole network would go down faster than you could blink.
This is exactly what I think.
I don't think we need people who will not investigate on their own. We're not trying to catch wild animals, but people we will interact with.
I would rather have fewer people who are fully convinced in the project, than have to be constantly reassuring them that the tankies under the bed aren't going to get them.
that the tankies under the bed aren’t going to get them.
Are you really ready to make that promise? I have a pretty tall bed and I haven't asked everyone under there what their ideologies are.
"Hacker News is for pedophiles."
The solution to pollution is dilution. Every sane user and instance weakens the grasp of the insane.
Also pretty sure it's just lemmy.ml, not all of the federated servers.
Maybe say something like, "That's like saying Reddit is for /r/TheDonald. It's just not true. Those guys are really niche. Lemmy is not that."
I think people responding to this with "just defederate them" or something in that vein are missing the point - the software lemmy is still being developed by "potential" tankies. It's not just an issue if they will ban you from the main instance if you speak against CCP, they decide what gets added to lemmy repo and in which direction they take the development and who's allowed to contribute.
I don't know enough yet to make a decision about it so i'm using both lemmy and kbin for now. Just wanted to point out that "ignore them" is not really an answer that solves everything. And besides, it is always good practice to be skeptical about who you're giving your data and money to on the internet.
Lemmy is open source. Worst case is people fork it and the community has to pay the new developers. But I don't think it will come to this. Now that the project is rolling I doubt that the devs will risk it. But wouldn't hurt to donate maybe a extra buck, if you already help your server instance, to finance another independent full time contributor.
Open source and AGPL licensed, we can separate the code from them at any time and we do not need permission.
Which one is the main instance? I want to test if I speak against CCP if I get banned. If I don't, that is one data point this issue isn't what people are saying. Plenty of data points are needed, I'm sure; but we Leftists are misrepresented and are not just one monolithic group. I meant to type "we know Leftists" are misrepresented but will leave the slip just the way it is, lol.
This is the thread I've seen talking about it https://lemmy.pineapplemachine.com/post/5781, I didn't really go further into the subject.
That's concerning. Will have to test and research.
lemmy.ml is the main one.
They'll remove your posts as they did to me.
They are Tankies, it's not potential. Just look at their profiles on Lemmy.ml
I've used Lemmy back when it was basically a wasteland and lemmy.ml was practically the only instance worth bothering with. Admins made a statement where they admitted the main two devs (and admins) were communists, however not everyone involved with the project, and they didn't employ political discrimination.
For what it's worth lemmy.ml also had a capitalist community, so they were fine with allowing opposing ideologies.
to a techie, i'd say, it's open source and if they ever overpushed politics, they'd find they'd become the fork as the community would fork away.
to a non-techie, i'd say, everyone's an asshole a different way, but they don't own the whole place like spez and musk do.
and i wouldn't argue. let them walk away haters. this platform isn't ready for everyone to come right now anyway.
Purity testing is an absurd road to go down. Hacker News is full of techbros, and as I understand it, it's run by Valley "angel investors." If "Lemmy = tankies → Lemmy is bad," then Hacker News is the worst thing imaginable.
Which, I mean, Hacker News is awful. Point being, who cares what techbros think?
How does (or should) one respond to “Lemmy = tankies”
My first question would be: "What's a tankie?"
The definition on Wikipedia seems relevant. I don't have much context on this; but it looks to me like the summary in this case could be: people who defend or are apologists for authoritarianism and violence, especially in China, Syria, or North Korea. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie
They are communists of the authoritarian vanguard party kind (known as marxism-leninism). There's different brands of socialism - some, like anarchists, prefer socialism to be focused around unions and decentralized aid groups, while others focus around using governments and vanguard parties. Tankies are of the latter variety
They're the kind of people to deny genocides of communist government
So they are basically saying they would like to live under the regime of Stalin back in the day(or a modern analog). A society where it didn't matter how left your were, or how correct you had been living all your life. If you were "in the way" for someone important with connections you and maybe your entire familie goes to the gulag.
I believe it's someone who is an idiot and an anti-capitalist. The kind of people who defend China's genocide in Xinjiang or the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Fair enough, thanks
Fair enough, ~~thanks~~ tanks
FTFY
I just want to add that being anticapitalist does not suffice to make you a tankie, tankies are also apologists of authoritarian "anti-west" governments (Mao's/Xi Jinping's China, USSR, Ghaddafi's Lybia...)
Trivia: The term "tankie" refers USSR's willingness to use tanks to opress opposition, infamously in the failed Hungarian revolution.
"That was before Reddit prollapsing into itself. Now lemmy has fresh new users with no extreme politics as their topic of interest"
Yup, this is why I'm here at least.
Explain that tankie and extreme political instances are consistently defederated, since its a federated platform. They can just find an instance that doesn't interact with the tankie instances.
I don't think we can say "consistently" when the largest instance federated with the largest tankie instance.
I've seen this raised quite often and, to be honest, it was kind of true in the beginning and that's probably where the opinion came from.
Ultimately, software like this is free and open to everyone; even those we don't agree with. We're going to have to come to terms with that fact because our own freedom rests upon it. There were going to be authoritarian left servers at some point, it just so happened to be at the beginning. There are also going to be authoritarian right servers if there aren't already. The software doesn't discriminate but it also doesn't discriminate against anyone else.
As for optics, I think all you can do is focus more on the beehaw community or whichever community you want to promote. This post was written to capture the spirit of the community if you need some inspiration. Some might not be convinced and that's okay, we just need to convince enough of their friends :)
If it really matters, suggest Kbin too. We can interact with Kbin magazines and users so Kbin's success is Lemmy's success and vice versa.
Is there a higher level of moderation? Say one serve flat out promote hate and encourage committing crimes, can it be shut down? Or its just that other servers would block it and move on?
Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.