this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38255 readers
2287 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The people responsible don’t care. They will be perfectly fine letting the rest of us die. They’ll only start giving a shit once cheap labor starts getting hard to come by.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Automation replaces manual works, AI replaces intellectual ones. No need for cheap labor in the short term.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Robots cost money. Sweatshop slaves work for food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This rule is actually "an order of magnitude best estimate", which means it's more of a range, somewhere between 0.1 to 10 deaths per 1000 tons of carbon burned.

That leaves a lot of room for scenarios even more dire than the one outlined here.

"When climate scientists run their models and then report on them, everybody leans toward being conservative, because no one wants to sound like Doctor Doom," explains Pierce.

"We've done that here too and it still doesn't look good."

Translation: 10 billion people will die.

2nd translation: Almost everyone will die.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

My wild ass guess is humanity will eventually die back to, at best, bronze age population levels.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Or it could end up being less bad than we expect.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"1 billion people on track to die"... I guess we're doing an empirical test of the trolley problem.

We have a choice between inconveniencing some people (especially some very rich people); vs saving billions of lives by switching tracks. And apparently the empirical choice is to equivocate and delay so that we stay on the path of death and ruin. ... It isn't the solution I would have chosen personally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Titan sub vs 300+ refugees in the med.