this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
319 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24319 readers
2780 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But they won’t. Business as usual. Insider trading. Denying healthcare. Forcing those struggling to pay for every minute aspect of life. Trying their best to turn America into a police state. Welcome to your 1984. Enjoy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago

100% of the R's, and 90+% of the D's, are too busy cashing their corporate/oligarch bribes to govern.

They were positioned to enact the will of the highest bidder — shadow written by corporate/lobbyist legal teams — so why would they care if 99.99% of voters want anything, when their 00.01% employers want the opposite?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

...Congress to claw back...

That would require courage and determination, which means it's not going to happen, because those are qualities Congress no longer possesses.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

That ship has sailed. It's probably only now starting to dawn on some of them that they've effectively abdicated their powers and they'll never get them back.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

A lesson societies keep taking longer and longer to relearn between revolutions. We’re all too comfortable with our bread and circuses to bother revolting. Not until we literally can’t get food, water, and / or shelter will we decide it’s finally high time we made examples of some of these colossal assholes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Too late. We're already in a dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

People have been saying this for decades. It’s not going to stop now

[–] ArbitraryValue 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The idea that Trump can start wars as he sees fit is a frightening one, but I'm not sure that in practice Congress is capable of making these decisions (especially with regard to unconventional military actions as opposed to traditional wars). It is simply too dysfunctional an institution, although I suppose institutional paralysis would lead to the outcome that isolationists and pacifists want.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

That's how it was meant to work. The president didn't get to order wars like this until after the 1940s.

Congress should only allow the president to act alone only if the homeland is directly attacked by another nation. Not a terrorist from another country, bona fide military forces. And maybe a handful of limited exceptions that directly impact US soil.

Otherwise we should deliberate and take time to think before getting involved in foreign wars. We have no right to try to police the world and it's a massive waste of resources

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Especially considering that the Iraq situation has no urgency. It was developing for at least a decade. There was and is more than enough time to go the official route.