this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
955 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6544 readers
730 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The monkey paw grants your wish but all the trains are built by Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those are called trolleys because they don't have doors

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would Americans care about trains when they're gonna be a billionaire any day now and have their own private jet?

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah i got used to TSA sexually assulting me just to get to the to my plane

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Rail is hard if it's from one country to another (I think Europe is the exception)

In my case, I have to take rail from Ankara to Edirne, Edirne to Bucharest, Bucharest to Vienna, and after Vienna I can access anywhere in Europe

The problem is, going from Edirne to Bucharest requires two visas

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

If you want to dive deeper into how rail cooperation was always hard I recommend looking into the history of the orient express

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Doesn't Europe have an extensive passenger train network?

Also, I recently rode on Amtrak for a long trip from Columbia, SC to Baltimore, MD. This was my first time on any kind of train other than a subway or metro line. It had its drawbacks (incredibly long travel time and delays), but I always felt safe, and I had a lot more room than I would have had on any flight. The major drawbacks where the seats were somewhat uncomfortable and things like that are largely due to the fact that the cars were pretty old, and not inherent to train travel if it was properly maintained. The cost was much less, and the free parking was such a great bonus.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (10 children)

tickets are cheaper? if you want to travel the same distance it is far from cheap to travel by train, in Europe at least

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Not to shit on your perfectly reasonable parade, but in Germany there is high speed rail through the whole . takes about 6 hours from top to bottom.

Now look at the scale of the US versus Germany and then the density of people living there. High speed rail makes alot of sense where it's difficult to build (bosnywash) and does not scale well in terms of time spent traveling.

Its better than car, but won't replace air travel anytime soon. Sadly.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

France has nearly the same population density as Ohio, and it has the TGV, which covers more than 5 times the land area of Ohio. So where's the Ohio high speed rail network?

This is the scale of Japan compared to the US east coast:

So why aren't there high speed lines that cover that same distance in the US?

Americans complain about US politicians and US policy on a near constant basis, and yet when comparing the US to other nations its apparently impossible for anyone to have made a stupid or self-serving decision. The US apparently is always operating at the absolute limit of what's physically possible, and if there's any deficiency compared to its peers its never because something was done wrong. Its always because "the US is too big" or "we're too diverse" (what does that even mean? You can't have nice things because black people exist?).

To be clear there are actual answers to the questions I posed above, but its not either of those moronic excuses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (8 children)

That statement is a bit too broad for me. You can not only use highspeed rail within Germany but also to reach the countries around it. E.g. Belgium, Netherlands, Austria, (ICE trains) or use the TGV to reach Paris in a reasonable time.

But with the (illegal) border controls currently it's insufferable. Will travel through France by train in September and I fear that the border controls will totally derail (haha) our time and travel plans.

We decided to use the train because the air connections took us longer since we didn't want to vacate in a city with an airport and don't live in one either.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mouselemming 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm not sure about other countries but one thing Amtrak has over planes is that they're more disability accessible. Still making improvements on legacy equipment but they're under the ADA, whereas airlines lobbied themselves out of it, which is why they never bothered to create wheelchair spaces or accessible bathrooms or even seats a normal human can occupy comfortably.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (17 children)

The only national passenger train service I know of is Amtrak, which shares its tracks with freight carriers. So the current infrastructure isn't designed for high-speed rail and freight carriers usually get priority.

Also, The US is really big, so everything isn't a short train ride away from everything else. If I wanted to visit the Grand Canyon from where I live, it's over 2,000 miles away. That's 30 hours of driving just by car.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because they like TSA fingering their assholes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (18 children)

The cost of dedicated passenger rail lines is staggering, and the US has a LOT of ground to cover.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As someone from Russia, we have even larger territory, and going by rail is almost twice as cheap as by plane.

High speed rail from Saint Petersburg to Moscow will cost you ~$45, going by plane will set you back ~$75 on the cheapest flight with hand luggage only. Considering the time losses associated with airports, you'll be at your destination almost as fast for way cheaper, so this option is widely preferred.

Same story with long distance trips - I plan on going for a 1000km trip in July, and train ticket costed me the same $45, while cheapest plane tickets go around $100. It's also a night train with beds and all, so I have one night accommodation for free while on my way. Depart - have a nice sleep - be on your destination in the morning and have a full day to yourself, fully rested.

If you're feeling adventurous, you can go all the way from Moscow to Vladivostok by single train for $250. This will take almost a week, but it will get you around half the planet for that money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Something like 30% of the US lives in the strip between Washington DC and Boston. It's absolutely achievable for the richest country on Earth to provide high speed rail in that section.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Train infrastructure is so underfunded (thx oil) that you can still get the fingering at most train stations for a really reasonable fee.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›