this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
55 points (95.1% liked)

World News

47724 readers
2750 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Queen is the most powerful piece on the board and they don't like that?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That’s easy to fix… new rules where the king and queen swap roles. Although that would mean protecting a woman above the men so maybe not.

[–] otp 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The woman barely has freedom of movement except once in her life and only by chauffeur.

The woman is never actually captured. The game ends when her capture is imminent.

The goal of the game is to kidnap someone else's wife.

Seems Taliban-friendly!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Actually, a piece that only moves or moves differently in the presence of another sounds like it could be interesting.

[–] otp 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Lol, that's a good point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

They could just use random names that conform to their beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Last time this came up, I learned that the piece we in the west call queen (you guys in English anyway, in German its Dame (meaning Lady)) is actually called Vesir/Consultant in that region. I think Wikipedia has a list per language, quite interesting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Wazir (Vesir in some languages) is a king's advisor. Consultant doesn't really fit. The role's more like a medieval chancellor.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Only infidels think more than one move ahead!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The given reason is that it enables gambling. Presumably they'll also be banning the other sports and games that are mentioned in the article, including those deeply beloved of whoever it is setting these rules.

If not, we can safely assume that the ban is probably because it's something that might get the ordinary folk thinking for themselves, and that won't do. Can't be having the proles thinking for themselves, let alone practising an approximation of military strategy.

Alternatively, the top brass can't get their heads around chess and they're jealous that other people can, so therefore they ban it. (For this one, I cite myself. I'm so bad at chess that I can lose any game from a winning position by playing the moves I genuinely think are best, so I'm kind of jealous of anyone without this amazing anti-power. That doesn't necessarily mean I'd ban it, but if I was running a country, maybe that'd go to my head and I would.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

And let's not forget that it encourages thought, which terrifies religious conservatives.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

The Taliban are ultra-reactionary religious conservatives. In other words, scum.

Anything that looks like a good time, they ban. Though they still rape boys for fun, since that's just Pashtu culture.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Some of those queens have awfully provocative curves. /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

religion is poison

[–] napkin2020 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

All while raping 12 year old girls are totally fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

they are not known for their intelligence

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I could see chess being a problem for the Taliban a couple of different ways...

First, as in the article, gambling.

"Buh, buh, chess isn't gambling!" Tell that to any number of street chess hustlers in the US, and there are LOTS of them.

https://www.chess.com/blog/Rodgy/i-flew-to-new-york-to-play-hustlers

Second, graven images. The Taliban takes that seriously, to the point of blowing up Buddha statues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

In stricter Muslim countries, the chess pieces are more abstract-looking. That's not really the issue.

The real issue is that they hate anything that makes life enjoyable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

It's global and egalitarian, so it's banned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

They've been cracking down on it.