this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
1439 points (99.5% liked)

Comic Strips

17421 readers
969 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My company is like this. They literally have a feature in the roadmap called AI, and say we have to do something with it because our competitors do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 165 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love the detail that she put "+ AI" on both sides of the equation so that it's still technically correct regardless of what the AI stands for.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sometimes it helps solve an equation by adding zero.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

This, this shit is why I would never have made a mathematician.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You say that but every time you make a void function that takes no arguments all the mathmaticians in a 12 mile radius combust.

[–] Fillicia 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why in python you should never write 0 when False is clearly the superior choice.

[1, 2, 4, 5][False]

1

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Fillicia 2 points 1 day ago

That not even the best

[1,2,3,4,5][-True]

>>> 5

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

my funding = 0
= -100M + 100M
= (the money I'll never made back to the investors) + (the shit I'll blow on AC and top gaming computers and stuff)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

you're joking but the world's economy at large actually works that way

company borrows 1M in the first year, next year instead of paying back, it borrows 2M ...

kinda "Hilbert's hotel". instead of running out of money, shift everything into more debt and continue ...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Really learning from the Arabs.

Al Project
Al Company
Al Product

[–] Fillicia 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

What have you done

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Al gebra - ‘the reunion of broken parts’,

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The word "al" means "the" in Arabic - for example, "al jazeera" means "the island". And a lower case L looks like a capital i, so "AI" is visually indistinguishable from "Al". So the joke is that people who try to shoehorn Artificial Intelligence into everything look like they're speaking in Arabic.

[–] jballs 115 points 3 days ago (8 children)

My company, while cutting back elsewhere, has dedicated a few million to AI projects over the next couple years. Not "projects to solve X business problem." Just projects that use AI.

So of course now, anything that is automated in any way is now being touted as AI. Taking data from one system and populating another? That's AI.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 3 days ago (6 children)
[–] jballs 16 points 3 days ago

Lol pretty much

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago

Taking data from one system and populating another? That’s AI.

Well, it is. You just have to go back enough in time to find the context when people still called it so.

Gotta use those automatic computers full of electronic brains to do all those tasks that used to take years on rooms full of people with chemical brains hired as computers!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

AI is such a loose term that calling anything with if-else statements “AI” wouldn’t be lying (I learned about decision trees in my university machine learning class and those are just giant nested if-else statements)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I’m old enough to have gone through a number of these technology bubbles, so much so that I haven’t paid much attention to them for a fair while. This AI bs feels a bit different, though. It seems to me that lots more people have completely lost their minds this time.

Like all bubbles, this too will end up in the same rubbish heap.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (10 children)

That's because there's a non zero amount of actually functionality. Chatgpt does some useful stuff for normal people. It's accessible.

Contrast that to crypto, which was only accessible to tech folks and barely useful, or NFT which had no use at all.

Ok, I guess to be fair, the purpose of NFT was to separate chumps from their money, and it was quite good at that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

There are pretty great applications in medicine. AI is an umbrella term that includes working with LLMs, image processing, pattern recognition and other stuff. There are fields where AI is a blessing. The problem is, as JohnSmith mentioned, it's the "solar battery" of the current day. At one point they had to make and/or advertise everything with solar batteries, even stuff that was better off with... batteries. Or the good ol' plug. Hopefully, it will settle down in a few year's time and they will focus on areas where it is more successful. They just need to find out which areas those are.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

it's maybe because chatbots incorporate, accidentally or not, elements of what makes gambling addiction work on humans https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/05/generative-ai-runs-on-gambling-addiction-just-one-more-prompt-bro/

the gist:

There’s a book on this — Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products by Nir Eyal, from 2014. This is the how-to on getting people addicted to your mobile app. [Amazon UK, Amazon US]

Here’s Eyal’s “Hook Model”:

First, the trigger is what gets you in. e.g., you see a chatbot prompt and it suggests you type in a question. Second is the action — e.g., you do ask the bot a question. Third is the reward — and it’s got to be a variable reward. Sometimes the chatbot comes up with a mediocre answer — but sometimes you love the answer! Eyal says: “Feedback loops are all around us, but predictable ones don’t create desire.” Intermittent rewards are the key tool to create an addiction. Fourth is the investment — the user puts time, effort, or money into the process to get a better result next time. Skin in the game gives the user a sunk cost they’ve put in. Then the user loops back to the beginning. The user will be more likely to follow an external trigger — or they’ll come to your site themselves looking for the dopamine rush from that variable reward.

Eyal said he wrote Hooked to promote healthy habits, not addiction — but from the outside, you’ll be hard pressed to tell the difference. Because the model is, literally, how to design a poker machine. Keep the lab rats pulling the lever.

chatbots users also are attracted to their terminally sycophantic and agreeable responses, and also some users form parasocial relationships with motherfucking spicy autocomplete, and also chatbots were marketed to management types as a kind of futuristic status symbol that if you don't use it you'll fall behind and then you'll all see. people get mixed gambling addiction/fomo/parasocial relationship/being dupes of multibillion dollar advertising scheme and that's why they get so unserious about their chatbot use

and also separately core of openai and anthropic and probably some other companies are made from cultists that want to make machine god, but it's entirely different rabbit hole

like with any other bubble, money for it won't last forever. most recently disney sued midjourney for copyright infringement, and if they set legal precedent, they might take wipe out all of these drivel making machines for good

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

and also some users form parasocial relationships with motherfucking spicy autocomplete,

I am officially slain and unironically think this may actually unironically be the beginning of the decline of humanity

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because AI is mostly built for tech outsiders. They literally thought that digital art, composing music on the computer, programming, etc. was literally telling the computer what to do. I remember around 2015 someone asking where they can choose art-styles in Photoshop, and what to tell the PC to draw something. Even I as a child thought that you just had to type "please draw me a car" into the Commodore 64 to draw you a car, without all the pixel-art.

I tend to call these "normie tech". Tech that is built for non-enthusiasts, which have negative consequences to the others, and even fool the some enthusiasts into worshipping them. If only I foresaw the dangers of overtly centralized social media...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I remember this as a kid being excited to do stuff like creating games, creating musing, video editing only to find out how hard, tedious and labourious it is. From outside it looks like computer do all the work but in reality computer only assists and the artists/programmer do all the work

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Because rich morons think they'll get free digital slaves out of it. Because they're rich morons who do not understand anything they ask for.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

It seems to me that lots more people have completely lost their minds this time

That's not really an AI thing, that's just... everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 days ago

This is exactly what my masters thesis feels like ATM, every attention is on all the AI crap also because the Uni gets grants ont the topic. Everything else just dies

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was equivalent from the start if we assume AI = 0

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago (8 children)

seeking for

  1. looking for
  2. seeking

You need to pick a lane, my dude.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Naz 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Microwave now with AI

I work in actual ML research and even I think it's stupid

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›