this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
365 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

14937 readers
2614 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

I remember being a tween in the mid/late 90s and trying to convince why Mormon friends why I believed being trans was real and possible, not that I especially understood what trans was. I figured if nature was so varied and had so many irregularities there was no reason that being born into the wrong body/the wrong sex couldn’t be one of those irregularities. Being this was the 90s and the topic hadn’t been politicized we all came to the conclusion it was reasonable for biology to “allow for” trans identities. I feel like even basic biology covered the concept of a person being trans just fine

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Slap 'em with the thing that says mushrooms have like 28 thousand genders and develop new ones all the time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

TIL.

[T]he fungi can mate with nearly every individual of their species they meet. [...] 23,000 different sexual identities, a result of widespread differentiation in the genetic locations that govern its sexual behavior.

Why is it useful to call them sexual identities then? Are exact matches not able to mate?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"sexual identities" lmao way to anthropomorphize freaking mushrooms 🤣

They're called mating types and are not at all comparable to the aforementioned, entirely human, concept

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

fungi: “I didn’t see you all the way over there.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why is this snail yellow? For me all snails are brownish.

[–] samus12345 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a banana slug. Fiat Slug!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

fascinating, their yellow color makes them more interesting for me. Are they all yellow or just some individuals?

They are generalist feeders, though they exhibit a preference for certain mushrooms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_slug

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

slugs will eat carrion if given the chances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I've seen 'em eating dead slugs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

hence why slugs, snails, aquatic and land ones carry a ton of parasites, they eat each others slime or feces. parasites love to use gastropods and decapods(crustaceans( as secondary hosts,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Most are yellow but they can be more tannish, white, or brown. Pacific banana slugs also often have black or dark brown spots (they look like overripe bananas) that can cover their entire body to make them black. Pacific banana slugs are usually less bright than California banana slugs too. The yellow is likely warning colouration: their slime has an anesthetic that numbs the tongue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

It's a banana for scale

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Timecircleline 4 points 2 days ago

Speak for yourself

[–] Tb0n3 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But it’s not, though. It’s the watered down children’s version of biology people half remember from elementary school. It’s not actual human biology.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Invoking snail biology is still a non-sequitur, regardless of the actual truth value of the initial statement

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is in one sense and isn’t in another. Someone saying “basic biology” is generally ignorant of the wide world of biology out there, either through lack of exposure or purposefully so.

The truth is that biology’s definitions are all humans’ ways of dividing up phenomena into neat little categories, but nature just exists as it is and doesn’t need to follow our linguistic rules.

For every definition we come up with, there are invariably multiple exceptions that don’t cleanly fit, because that’s just not how nature works. Even basic definitions like “sex,” “species,” and “life” itself start to get shaky the moment we try to eliminate all the exceptions.

The truth is that for humans there is no single, universally accepted definition of sex or gender. And even attempts to reduce them to something tangentially related like genotype quickly fall apart when you start looking at the exceptions. The person who says that there being two human sexes (usually to the exclusion of gender identity) is “basic biology” is not only categorically wrong, but they’re either ignorant of or ignoring the granularity of our own species. The whole of human sex and gender identity cannot be neatly summed up as “Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina” from Kindergarten Cop.

So are the slugs relevant? I would say yes, because if you’re not aware of the variation in nature on the obvious macro scale you have no prayer of appreciating it on the more subtle micro scale.