1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
"No, I am your father."
"You're absolutely right! When Obi-Wan told me about my father's death, he probably meant that the person he knew my father as is dead, since your personality and appearance have changed drastically since then. I'm glad we could clear up this misunderstanding!"
"Also, regarding the white genocide in south Africa..."
I unironically think nic cage would kill it in a parody of this idea. Randomly gets and loses a prosthetic finger between scenes. The background changes slightly randomly. And instead of a full script he's given the equivalent of a prompt for each scene and just has to "figure it out"
This has me wondering how often, if ever, Cage has ad-libbed a scene.
I dunno about dialog, but he's famously made some decisions that were not asked for, anticipated, or appreciated.
Like the entirety of Vampire's Kiss?
Half his movies work as a punchline, here. Wild At Heart only gets a pass because David Lynch absolutely asked for that absurdity.
I've been convinced that scripts for several big budget films over the last few years have already been written by LLMs. Scripts for things like The Marvels and the last 2 Mission Impossible films (just the first couple that immediately come to mind) are stream-of-consciousness slop with inconsistent logic, jargon that makes no god damn sense, side characters and tangents that come out of nowhere and do nothing, and really forced 'member berries, because as Jay from RLM puts it; "nostalgia is the new cocaine!"
Mission Impossible movies are stunts strung together with technobabble exposition. You don't need LLM for that.
Nah, they're just the results of a film industry who's spent decades running on the principle that the best qualification for getting into the industry is the willingness to kiss the asses of the people that were already there.
I like The Marvels and I don't see any of those issues you're talking about. Examples?
bUt aI iS tHe fUtUrE!!11111
Sounds like a Donald Trump speech
God. They really are going to do this. And then scream and cry when people hate it.
You can bet that pitches for movies/ TV series are already written with LLMs and first drafts of scripts probably too.
A bunch of first draft song lyrics, too. I know a lot of idea generation for songs has gone that way. Most songs in popular genres sit in the same basic scaffold so it's been easy for them to say "give me a (4, 6, or 8) line verse talking about such and such. Then give me a chorus that reinforces that idea. Ok, how do we move the second verse forward? Give me a couple of chorus variations. Big emotional high point bridge". Then they go through it with a scalpel to make it coherent and keep it flowing. Then they do another 10, varying the number of lines, the number of verses, or remove the bridge or whatever.
Have you seen how far it's come in just a few short months though? It's incredible the pace they've been achieving.
Yeah it's actually gotten scary how fast it's been progressing. Even this post is outdated, the hand issues haven't been a problem in a while
I feel like on image/video generation, I can agree that the recent months have shown a lot of progress.
I'm not so much feeling it on the text generation front, it's felt about the same to me for a while here, notably impressive, but still a bit... off...
Probably there is a lower ceiling in text generation to things that are considered "progress" by everyone. People can verbalize exactly what is wrong with pictures and video, but for text, if it is coherent and gets the point across what is progress beyond passing the Turing test?
yeah, I think the OP's take is really naive
the tools and models will get a lot better, but more importantly the end products that succeed will make measured, judicious use of AI.
there always has been slop, and people will always misuse tools and create abominations, but the heights of greatness that are possible are increasing with AI, not decreasing
I'm not even steeped in the depths of it. I've got friends who are using MCP and agents that can modify files on their own and work through problems over time and self-learn on your existing code, etc.
It's crazy and makes my head spin. Many of them were super skeptical early on but the tools that are being developed are absolutely BONKERS.
Developers present AI like it's static and in its final form. No vulnerabilities or mistakes will ever get fed back into the training data. Everything will be direct to production. Their entire world is updates and new features until AI gets brought up. And "slop". That's their "woke".
No AI developer presents it like it's static and in its final form. None. Not one of them. They are all racing for market share. We're seeing leaps and bounds of improvements in the shortest of timeframes, even in the open source sector.
And this zealotry doesn't even take into account that...humans make mistakes too. Much more than AI generates 'slop', there are a million garbage artists out there that produce complete trash. There are millions of people on the internet generating bad advice (Where's Mankrik's wife?).
I've seen people with this same attitude, attribute things incorrectly to AI slop because someone used an em-dash somewhere in their reply. So not only can't the detractors actually tell what's AI or not, their fundamentalist attitudes lead them to perceive every mistake as "AI SLOP".
I can't tell if you think I'm talking about AI developers when I said developers.
Hollywood is fucked. There's already local models, running on any gaming PC, that'll turn whatever footage you have into whatever footage you describe. Making it look like real actors is what a child would do.
I know why idiots in suits expect that to replace writers. I don't know why sane outsiders also believe that. This tech allows any writer with a trunk script (and a solid view of their mind's eye) to drag their dream project into reality for like a thousand bucks. Do you think that kind of unfiltered creativity is going to do worse than some commercial slop hose chasing what used to cost a billion dollars?