[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

You like Lain, rats, and silly catposting?? Do you wanna be frens?

208
rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
327
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
189
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Just a month to celebrate relaxation and not obsessing over the grind. Festivals where people just bring camping chairs and chill together. Companies pandering by giving paid extra time off to employees. And so on.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

No way this is real. He'd be carrying around dozens of kilograms of digested food with him at this point.

190
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago
[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

I'm kind of dissatisfied with the answers here. As soon as you talk about actually drawing a line in the real world, the distinction between rational and irrational numbers stops making sense. In other words, the distinction between rational and irrational numbers is a concept that describes numbers to an accuracy that is impossible to achieve in real life. So you cannot draw a line with a clearly irrational length, but neither can you draw a line with a clearly rational length. You can only define theoretical mathematical constructs which can then be classified as rational or irrational, if applicable.

More mathematically phrased: in real life, your line to which you assign the length L will always have an inaccuracy of size x>0. But for any real L, the interval (L-x;L+x) contains both an infinite number of rational and an infinite number of irrational numbers. Note that this is independent of how small the value of x is. This is why I said that the accuracy, at which the concept of rational and irrational numbers make sense, is impossible to achieve in real life.

So I think your confusion stems from mixing the lengths we assign to objects in the real world with the lengths we can accurately compute for mathematical objects that we have created in our minds using axioms and definitions.

191
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago

I love playing this with my cat. Works especially well when you audibly drag your feet and when you move around corners or behind objects a lot. I learned this by watching my cat play with her son. However she only lets me play the prey role and gets aggressive when I do the same to her. Her son also used to let me hunt him a bit, but he disappeared one day :/

[-] [email protected] 135 points 6 months ago

I see a lot of hate against the concept of doing one's own research on the internet and it really bothers me. The problem is not doing one's own research. The scientists that wrote this paper also did their own research. All scientists (should) do their own research. That's inherent to science and that's part of what got humanity this far. The problem is that some people lack the capabilities to properly assess information sources and draw correct conclusions from them. So these people end up with incorrect beliefs. Of course they could just "trust the experts" instead, but how are they supposed to know which experts to trust if they're not good at assessing sources of information? Finding those experts is in itself a task that requires you to do your own research.

TL;DR: I think this hate on "doing your own research" is unjustified. People believing nonsense is a problem that is inescapable and inherent to humanity.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Of which sugars:

[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

When people want to enter a bus, especially a crowded one, it makes a lot more sense to wait for the people who want to get out of the bus to leave first.

This one is so baffling to me, it's really changed my view of how stupid some people really are. What do they even expect, that the other passengers magically disappear? It's really not an abstract problem if the other passengers are trying to leave right in front of you. Trying to enter a bus is also not a rare situation, so you'd expect people to understand this at least after the first few times. Unbelievable.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Soijaks have gone too far

51
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Users be like "I'm encountering mostly promotional articles in my RSS feed"

My brother in christ, you curated the feed

18
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hello :) Has anyone here played CP2077 on both Xbox Series S and the Steam Deck? Because these are the only platforms I have, and I'd like to buy the game for one of them. What I'd like to know specifically is if there are performance differences that significantly affect the gameplay itself, not just graphics. So things like draw distance or framerate dropping so low that it affects how you play, or having less NPCs on the streets. Thanks in advance.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

The very fact that they're able to do all of this is also an effect of the mitochondria in their cells. But if people tell me to stop talking about mitochondria 24/7, then I should just find a group of other mitochondria enthusiasts to interact with instead of ranting about how I'm ""right"" to make everything about mitochondria.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Definitely no. In addition to the downsides you mentioned, I feel like the redditor's desire for karma is what causes these hiveminds/echo chambers and cliché comments that are so typical of many subreddits.

Edit: Thank you so much for the gold kind stranger!

view more: next ›

benni

joined 1 year ago