this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
170 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23703 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that Donald Trump overreached when he unilaterally imposed tariffs on imports from more than 100 countries. CNN’s Elie Honig called the development “a huge setback” for the president.

In a unanimous decision issued on Wednesday, judges halted the president’s tariffs with a permanent injunction. The ruling nullifies Trump’s 30% tariff on Chinese goods, the 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico, and the baseline 10% tariffs Trump imposed on most countries on April 2, or “Liberation Day,” as he called it. In issuing those tariffs, Trump bypassed Congress by citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Tariffs on automobiles and steel will remain.

The lawsuit was filed by Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian legal advocacy group.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Great, since that was illegal, I’ll get a refund for the product I imported, right? Those tariffs cost my small business $6k this year.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, you can sue him/the administration in civil court for the damages, which should be an open and shut case if the courts rule his bullshit was illegal

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, massive class action by everyone who bought tariff goods. Sounds like a jolly good time.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can't sue a sitting president for official acts. Supreme court already anticipated this

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You'd be suing the government for damages, not him as an individual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Fair point, not sure if it would dissuade trump from anything, though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

You can* sue CBP and Secretary Noem in her official capacity for collecting illegal tariffs from you.

*Probably. I'm not a lawyer. Don't take legal advice from the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

"We can't have trials for every little thing..! Now, off to CECOT with ya."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Apparently yes

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)

that's because Trump has no fucking idea what he's doing in the first place

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think it was mainly about manipulating the stock market so that he and his cronies could enrich themselves illegally. You know, organized crime.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's the thing, they know that. Trump just thinks he's "winning" as a master negotiator.

There are a bunch of smart people who know what they're doing, but they're pinning all the blame on the useful idiots like Trump, RFK Jr., Leavitt, Bondi, etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Yes, I also think that Drump is more of a straw man. He certainly benefits from all these obvious crimes, but I don't think he's actually the brains behind the operation - he lacks the intellect for that.

Either way, the ones who lose out in all this are the US citizens and, as always, the socially disadvantaged in particular.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Yeah, what's amazing is that for someone who already did the job for 4 years and got fired, he seems to have gotten worse at it than last time

[–] nkat2112 3 points 3 days ago

This, and thank you.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Lets pause for a moment and consider how dumb this situation makes Trump look on the world stage. He's picks a fight with the entire world over tariffs, and obnoxiously demands that everyone comply with his wishes under the pain of losing trade. Then, a court rules that he never had the power to issue the tariffs in the first instance and voids them. The "deals" he's supposedly struck now are worthless, and the countries that held out and didn't bend to Trump's whim have won. The only country harmed by the tariffs is the United States. It's like starting a fight by punching yourself in the face.

[–] kruhmaster 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can we please put him in a concrete capsule and fire him miles underground?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's morally unconscionable. It's like injecting the Earth with cancer.

Why not sew him, space Goebbels, Thiel, and the entire nazi regime together as one big fascist human centipede, then shoot them into the sun?

[–] atomicbocks 4 points 3 days ago

Well, it’s a little counterintuitive but it’s really hard to shoot stuff at the Sun as opposed to the opposite direction. That’s why the Parker Solar Probe holds the human made speed record. When you leave Earth you are already going at Earth orbital speeds around the Sun give or take Earth escape velocity. The closer to the Sun you get the faster you go and the more speed you have to bleed off with fuel to not get slingshotted out into the Kuiper Belt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Hyrule tried this with Ganon and look where that got them

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He will just ignore the ruling and do it anyway. Democrats will express their concern.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

Just putting it out there, but the only reason this ruling was even possible was because of democratic states suing the government. So the first step has been taken and Republicans weren't the ones doing it. We can bitch about Democrats all you want, but this is a direct result of their actions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

He might ignore it and keep yelling out numbers. But doesn't this mean the people actually collecting the tariffs have to stop? And especially entities in blue states would use it as an excuse to stop collecting.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Maybe he should try doing this legally for once. He might see fewer setbacks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

This asshole still being alive is always such a bummer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The trials for the people in this administration are going to be glorious

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Lol, Do you really think the law will apply to them?