this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
617 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23667 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's like they can't help being assholes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Federal Judge in Texas? Dont even need to open the article to know that has to be that fucker in Amarillo.

Damn it I hate this timeline

[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yup. For those who are not aware, they structured that district specifically so that all lawsuits filed in certain zip codes in Amarillo go to this guy. So any time they need a convenient MAGA cout ruling, they find someone in Amarillo to file the lawsuit over it.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also says something about Amarillo ~~I'm~~ in general that they can always find their plaintiffs there.

[–] skulblaka 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hmm... Sounds blatantly illegal.

Put it on the pile, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It was a key component of the southern strategy that the Republican Party focused on. Basically, you don’t need to pack every court. Just structure one area in a way that one or two ultra-con judges can rule on everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So any time they need a convenient MAGA cout ruling,

I read this as MAGA cunt ruling

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Those two are basically the same now

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

It will eventually lead to the end of American based hegemony. It is going to take about a decade and a lot of suffering of the American people.

But on the flip side China will have more room to grow wheat.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I had the unpleasant experience of having to stay a night in Amarillo on a road trip. I went to a bar close to my hotel, and every single person including the fucking bartender was smoking.

It was disgusting, I got a large round of drinks for my group and we went to the patio where nobody was and away from the smoke, we did roshambo to determine who had to go back into the cancer room to get more drinks.

I had to go in twice and each time this man was over explaining pool to some woman, over what was probably 30 to 40 minutes I don't think she ever took a shot, and that dude was still talking out his ass.

Also, just like in the movies some guy comes out and walks up to us and says, "y'all aren't from around here", I kinda got anxious, but it turned out he was a nice person and even educated and just desperate for a decent conversation.

Amarillo is a shit hole, and Lubbock is even worse, probably the most toxic air I have ever had to endure, it was nauseating.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk must have a lot of cases to handle since seemingly every far right case is filed in his court. We’re going to have so many judicial reforms to enact to bring back even the semblance of rule of law but add venue shopping to the list.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have to wonder what this guy gets up to in private. Has anyone checked Grindr in his area?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you even need to check ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it's amazing to me how many people take pride in bigotry

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I really dont get how you could be anything less than humiliated to take pride in, and belittle others, over something you have absolutely no part in.

While this 2008 bit is about Nationalism, the point is the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welcome to the beginnings of genocide

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

LGBTQN+ where N is for "non-fascist"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Man these rebrandings are getting out of hand /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Seems to me that if you can discriminate on gender identity and sexual orientation, you should be able to discriminate on any basis at all. Maybe next time this asshole goes out to dinner, he should be served like the little bitch he is. Bring his food and drink in pet bowls and remove his silverware.

[–] explodicle 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They would wholeheartedly agree with you because they can buy their way out of discrimination and we can't.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Well, just discriminate the prices then. Mr. fancy pants can afford to be intolerable to everyone else? That'll be 2,000$ for the 100$ meal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah like would not this mean that we couldst nowen discriminate against cishet people?

Most welcome tidings, twere it not for the inverse of such.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago

Just wow! I can't even express how dumbstruck I am by idiocy like this.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

All people are created equal (terms and conditions apply)

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All people are created equal, but some are more equal than others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

All people are created equal.

Equality subject to change without notice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

About damn time! These fucking leftists were so mean to me by imposing onto me that I can't harrass people based on their sexuality! Like... what kind of world are we leaving our children if they can't even discriminate others peacefully?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Oh, no! It’s not just harassment!

You can destroy someone’s life and livelihood because you think they’re gay!

Getting fired from a job at a time when the federal gov is actively cutting social supports, and intentionally driving the economy to ruin when most U.S. citizens have meager savings (if any), and are dependent on employer provided health care is an instant path to free fall for most people! Unless those peasants have family that is willing and able to support them, or a high demand skill that will overlook a recent firing (an automatic D/Q on most HR systems), they are going to lose their ability to feed themselves, pay for their housing, and their transportation in this car-poisoned society.

It’s not merely a little ‘fuck you’ but you can end their relationships, destroy their health, prevent them from working in their chosen field, and make them die on the streets! Even barring the most extreme outcomes, the health and financial implications from the stress or loss of income can permanently adjust the trajectory of their life (and the life of everyone that is close to or dependent on them) downward.

Exciting times for soulless bigots!

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Why can’t people be punished for being anti-lgbt? There is no non-religious reason to belive so and religion is an invalid reason. Because these people deserve punishment.

[–] Jakeroxs 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

LGBTQ should just start their own religion, with blackjack and hookers!

Fr tho lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty sure that satanic church would welcome them, theyre really great at using the christianity fueled peoples words and rules against them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

He's not a judge - he's a right wing mouthpiece playing to goddists. What a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How long until straight men will be fired, or at least yelled at, for supposedly being gay for not risking their lives at work?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

My work photo is my brother-in-law and I posing in tuxes at his and my sister's wedding

Objectively, I look super gay in the photo

I haven't changed it because I'm waiting for the homophobe to yell at the straight guy for his gay-looking photo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

How Christian of them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Oh hey, it's this asshole. This guy is the reason I reacted to that news about making all court rulings only apply locally with some humorous positivity. (also because humor helps me cope with general awfulness)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The same for fascists and nazis then too, right?

OoOooOO!! Someone likes a STWONG MAN :3 UwU You gonna suck Trump's dick? That's very LGBTQ+ of you...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Discriminating based on political ideology was always allowed.

It just doesn't matter and isn't a good rebuttal because the fascists and Nazis are the ones with the power, so discrimination against them doesn't hurt them the way their discrimination hurts others.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Many states never agreed with LGBT people having employment at all. Much of the history involves homelessness as a result of not being able to have sustained work because in many states, society would label and sabotage the ability for LGBT or people believed to be LGBT to have employment which is necessary to maintain housing. It was very much a sustained, methodical, approach that was taken. This is true going back to the Lavendar Scare in the Federal Govt, where like rooting out communists during the McCarthy era, they made sure to take all the Govt jobs away from anyone believed to be gay. Discrimination at work is a key means of taking away the right for someone to work.

Now they have many new weapons to enforce this end result in the lives of people living in the states that want to bring this back.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

The fuck???? 🖕🇺🇸🖕♾️

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Page 21 of the ruling:

First, the Enforcement Guidance contravenes Title VII's plain text by expanding the scope of "sex" beyond the biological binary: male and female. Although Title VII defines "sex" to also include "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions," §2000e(k), the Enforcement Guidance concludes that "sex" under Title VII "includes 'pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions' and sexual orientation and gender identity." Enforcement Guidance, §I(A)(5) (emphasis added). Notably, the Guidance uses quotation marks around "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions"—but not "sexual orientation" or "gender identity." Because neither the plain text of Title VII nor Supreme Court precedent defines Title VII "sex" this broadly. Thus, the Enforcement Guidance lacks statutory or jurisprudential authority to expand Title VII's definition of "sex" to include these new categories.

Interestingly, this also seems to provide a legal basis to discriminate against straight people and cis people. It'll be interesting to see how Republicans attempt to close that extra loophole without also closing the loophole for discrimination against LGBTQ people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

You know what isn't protected in the US? Political affiliation.

Start denying MAGA trash employment and service.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Time to break out the combat boots.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Texas can't secede fast enough, maybe we can get a twofer with florida

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[–] untakenusername 5 points 1 week ago

average Texas moment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

No, they absolutely can help being assholes. But for them it's not enough to win, those they see as "losers" must suffer.

load more comments
view more: next ›