Fuck AI

Isn't it? A physically disabled person might suck absolute arse at walking, I suck absolute arse at drawing. I will never get good at it, either - I went through 9 years of art class in school and in 9th grade my drawings weren't much better than 1st. Might as well consider it a mental disability at this point. Okay, technically I DO have a mental disability, it's called ADHD, and it makes learning some skills so difficult I wonder how anyone can do these things, while others are a breeze to the point where I wonder how other people don't manage as easily as I do. Yes, I see the irony.

For a while, I've wanted to make a few video games. I've actually got three in mind. I'd like to make one 3D game, one fast-paced side-scrolling platformer and one tiled top-down game. For each, I have a vision of how to make them fun (hopefully) and differentiate from a lot of existing games. But I can't do it because I have no art skills and I can't afford to pay an artist for the sheer amount of work it would take to produce all the assets for a full game. I am also not going to approach someone and say "Heeeeeeey wanna put in a bunch of work for nothing but a share in the proceeds from a game that may never make 20 bucks?" So my best bet, really, is to focus on either of the 2D games, have AI help me out with the art (which may well be quite difficult if I want to keep a consistent style) and then on the 0.000000001% chance that it's commercially successful, I can commission art for the next game, or on the 0.00000000000000000001% chance that it's very successful, hire a full time artist or two.

Note that I haven't done it, but it's something I've considered.

Based and redpilled

I love lamp.

You either do something and are immediately good at it, or you should just stop altogether.

I bet this line speaks to a lot of fellow lemmings who are middle aged nerds with ADHD and were “gifted” in school.

Many people do not want to put any effort into learning a new skill, so asking AI to do it for them is just way more convenient and “accessible”.

...and then they flood the internet with their garbage zero-effort slop.

I agree with the first part, but I think the second part is unsubstantiated.

I'm sure all disabled people love hearing "Oh this other disabled guy showed extraordinary willpower and overcame his disability against all odds why can't you"

The game Katawa Shoujo, which was actually made by a cooperation between people who were on 4chan, depicts amputees and disabled folk, one of which is an artist which draws with her feet, with many of them having traumatic experiences that you hear of as you get to know of them more personally

It's good. I like it.

I can do some pixelart on my S23 Ultra, and even sketch some ideas down in work.

Doesn't that require a load of computer power? My computer could start a house fire opening a PDF.

I would argue that 'free' just means the cost is hidden and you might end up paying it anyway through the societal effects that the energy demands of LLMs cause. That is, there's a cost and it will make it back to you somehow or other because that's how tech oligarchy works.

IDK. I don't like AI for commercial applications. But for frivolous things? That's it's critical application. I'm not taking food from the mouth of any artist if I post some AI meme image I generate onto a social media site. There is no universe where I'm paying an actual professional artist to make meme images for me to post to social media. I'll sometimes use AI slop, but only in slopworthy applications. Screwing around on fediverse and other sites is such a slopworthy application.