this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
94 points (94.3% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3589 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's because they're eugenists that very thinly veil the fact that they believe nazi shit

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Actions do speak louder that words

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is all new to me, and I know I'm going to regret asking, but who are these people?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Elon Musk and Peter Thiel?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How fucking creepy are these people?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Very creepy

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who funds stoppoulationdecline.org? Population decline is a good thing. source

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
  1. Apparently someone who hates Musk and loves working from home considering the article

  2. I don't know, apparently this is the author's contact info. Ask him https://www.stoppopulationdecline.org/author/david/

  3. Depends on what's causing decline. If its people not wanting kids then it's a good thing, it it's people not able to have the kids they want because Capitalism is squeezing them dry or assholes like Musk is reducing work flexibility then it's a bad thing

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no love for capitalism. But population decline helps with climate change.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, better and more effective and efficient systems help with Climate Change like Nuclear and Renewables, banning plastic in favor of infinitely recyclable glass, or more relevant, let people work from home instead of driving to an office building.

We live in a world of fixed costs that looks like it’s variable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nuclear is not a panacea, mostly due to the cost, waste, and risk of catastrophe.

We can't grow our way out of this existential mess.

It's clear we need to reduce population.

Easy to agree on WFH, but of course that is just a drop in the bucket.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I had your optimism, but this makes me doubtful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/YsA3PK8bQd8?si=6bu4oVLrK760tx4a

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Population decline from the black death was the #1 factor that caused the Renaissance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nyaaah, when will people understand? No one in the rich and powerful and tech circles cares about people. We're "human resource" and always have been, one more mineral to be strip-mined until exhaustion (cf. South Korea) or obsolence (cf. echbros' AI wet dreams). Once gone or too hard to mine, the drilling ops move on to another quarry just like with minerals (offshoring).

High fertility in the West is bad because the American and European human mines are capital-intensive while the global South still has billions of units laying bare on the ground. "Pronatalism" is only about the top of pyramid and the narrow slice just below it - white, educated, well-mannered, elegant, artistically minded and creative societe who perpetuate the imaginary, self-proclaimed "western culture". Shame they are also those who are too worried to have lots of kids in this economy and climate, but oh well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you calling Musk elegant?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His mom certainly is despite everything

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Moms don’t count

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but if you work from home, you get to spend more time with your kids. You're supposed to have children, not care about them. Just ask Elon about his kids or his own childhood.