this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
468 points (99.8% liked)

politics

22813 readers
4560 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, knowing the brutality of prisons... he might be dead. In which case, not only is it a showdown between the executive and judicial branches. It would lead to actual chaos as the Right has to try to make the unjust death of a man sound noble in the name of politics and the the Left struggles to figure out what the hell you do to bring justice when no one wants to serve it.

I pray he can return home safe and sound.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's their justification

"Brown gang member"

That's literally all terrified white Christian nationalists need to hear.

Doesn't matter at all whether it's true or not.

[–] [email protected] 147 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Here we go. The showdown we all knew was coming.

P..S. they can't allow him to return and report on what goes on there. I'm willing to bet he is dead or will soon be killed.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Showdown maybe. They don't have a deadline or consequences for failing to act or requirement that they actually take steps which result in his being returned to the US.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The showdown is the answer of the question "Will trump disobey the orders of the supreme court of the land?" If that answer is yes then we are in an interesting timeline

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The constitutional crisis has been underway since inaguration day, but the wheels of justice grind slowly so there is some delay between getting knocked off track and the inevitable trainwreck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

There are no wheels of justice on this sinking ship. If justice were to come it'd be from somewhere else.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Maybe they’ll send a sternly worded email.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Looking at the Google Earth pictures, it looks like this isn't a prison but a death camp.

Maybe that's why they are fighting so hard to bring him back, because everyone would learn what they did.

Edit: if your didn't see the posts, search CECOT on Google maps. It also looks like there might be mass graves up north.

They sent them to jail, yet we don't know what they exactly did (all they told us they were in a vegetable gang), we don't know how long they supposed to be jailed and how would they finish serving their sentence. Most of those people aren't even from El Salvador, so where would they go after.

It looks like they are never meant to leave the place and the payment was one time, so it looks like he just outsourced the killing.

[–] CaptDust 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

CECOT Prisoners are not intended to leave, ever, according to Bukele's justice minister. 156 violent people shoved into 100 square meter cells with no regard for gang affiliation. Steel bunks 3 levels high - no mats, no windows, just a toilet and wash basin shared among everyone in a cell. They're fed rice without utensils, and provided zero outdoor time or visitation.

Basically a steel and concrete pit built to make people wish they got the death penalty.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

It looks like a cattle farm from the sky, except that cattle barns have plenty of windows and usually allow the cows some level of movement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I assume you mean 100 square feet cells? 100 square meter cells sounds quite luxurious - unless that's the total area.

[–] CaptDust 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

100 m^2^ cell with 156 people per cell = .6 m^2^ per person. In reality even less, as it doesn't account space for bunks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

They put a lot of people in the cells, not just 2 or 3. So they are quite large and still quite crowded.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

search CECOT on Google maps

I've seen enough WWII movies to know what a stalag looks like.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (6 children)

It looks like there is PLENTY of room to expand.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I see what looks like tree farms, where are you seeing mass graves?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

"Here he is!"

head shaven, 30lbs lighter, scars on his head, won't say complete sentences or look anyone in the face.

"He's fine!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Trump will ignore them, they will do nothing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They showed the prison on the news but didn't show the prisoners from America. That's suspicious

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Puppy Killer Noem, and a network news journalist have managed to get permission to get into that prison with camera crews, but somehow the entire HitlerPig administration cant seem to reach anyone who can authorize this guy's release?

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 days ago (4 children)

9-0??

Somebody miss a payment to Clarence Thomas?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing Roberts and Alito know the admin will ignore this court order and pushed Thomas to make it unanimous for the fight to keep the judiciary an actual branch of the government that is to follow

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The ruling is also meaningless. They ruled the US has to "facilitate" his return, but does not have to "effectuate" his return. The admin will interpret this to mean that as long as El Salvador doesn't take active steps to send him back, the US doesn't have to do anything to try to make them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I believe the original Federal judge has clarified the order?

Here's a link to the ruling issued just a couple hours ago & is requiring a response by early tomorrow morning:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

EDIT: Here's the direct text:

The Supreme Court’s April 10, 2025 decision in Noem v. Abrego Garcia, 604 U.S.—–, No. 24A949, affirmed this Court’s Order at ECF No. 21 (the “Order”), and directed that on remand, this Court clarify its use of the term “effectuate,” according proper deference to the Executive Branch in its conduct of foreign affairs. See Slip Op. at 2. To this end, the Court hereby amends the Order to DIRECT that Defendants take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia to the United States as soon as possible. Further, as the Supreme Court made clear, “the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps.” See Slip Op. at 2.

Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS Defendants to file, by no later than 9:30 AM ET on Friday, April 11, 2025, a supplemental declaration from an individual with personal knowledge, addressing the following: (1) the current physical location and custodial status of Abrego Garcia; (2) what steps, if any, Defendants have taken to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s immediate return to the United States; and (3) what additional steps Defendants will take, and when, to facilitate his return. To the extent Defendants believe any portion of their submission must be filed under 1 Case 8:25-cv-00951-PX Document 51 Filed 04/10/25 Page 2 of 2 seal, they shall comply with the Court’s Local Rules governing the sealing of materials. See D. Md. Loc. R. 105.11.

Finally, the Court will hold an in-person status conference on Friday, April 11, 2025, at 1:00 PM ET, at the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, 6500 Cherrywood Lane, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

That’s wild, usually he can be counted on to write something about how Thomas Jefferson actually wanted everyone to get in fatal plane crashes every day.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I heard his RV is a little run down.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Could have gotten a brand new one from John Oliver.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

9-0? Hell has been freezing over a lot these past couple days.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

The Trump administration had, in these cases, doubled down with an argument that was incredible in its breadth: not only can courts not order the government to undo erroneous removals, it argued — it could also do the same to U.S. citizens, evading judicial scrutiny so long as it all took place before a lawsuit was filed.

Bruh 💀

See y'all in El Salvador 😭

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Importantly, they replaced the lower Court's order to "effectuate" his return with "facilitate" and defined "facilitate" as to remove any barriers to his return on the US side.

So the ruling is actually "Don't prevent the government from which he was fleeing and that is now holding him prisoner in a labor camp from flying him back to the US for asylum."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

There is a reply by the user monstrosity with a quote in which the Supreme Court clarified that it meant effectuate, and they're holding a status meeting this morning to see what progress is made.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

“Pinky swear you’ll put the Uber app on your phone and send him a ride.”

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago

The task is impossible as he's already dead.

There will be more excuses and more delays until they do something more stupid to get your attention off that.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Curtis Yarvin, the Neil Breen of political “philosophers,” wrote that ignoring the courts is part of the plan- here’s his test case.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Oh no you're reading this wrong. SCOTUS just gave them permission. They said they must "facilitate" and that the lower courts order to "effectuate" was likely an over step.

The payload here is that facilitating means they'll send an official request that El Salvador will officially deny and then tell everyone they did everything they were ordered to do.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

Roberts - "YOU STUPID BASTARD, YOU'RE GOING TO GET US ALL KILLED, AND I DON'T EVEN HAVE 2 YACHTS YET! MAKE IT HAPPEN, NOW!"

Trump - "FUCK YOU, I'M GOING TO TELL MY DADDY PUTIN ON YOU! WATCH WHAT YOU TOUCH AND DRINK FROM NOW ON, MOTHERFUCKER! I AM KING OF THE WORLD!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They are going to kill him, otherwise he will talk and all the secrets will come out.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thank fuck, was very worried it was a total lost cause

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago

They did not set any conditions on his return. Trump will just ignore the order and claim to be "working on it"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Nope, news everywhere has been fucking this headline up. SCOTUS defined the government's duty as requesting his release politely and allowing him back in if El Salvador does release him. The previous ruling would have forced the state department to tell El Salvador they must do it, or else. This is a far lower standard and will not be enough to get him released because the leadership in El Salvador knows Trump doesn't want the guy to come back.

[–] pelespirit 18 points 2 days ago

How Abrego Garcia wound up in the mix remains unclear. The Trump administration frustrated one district court’s attempts to determine what happened by invoking the state secrets privilege over basic questions about the operation; it’s only said that Abrego Garcia was wrongly removed because he was placed on an alternate manifest that failed to note the order barring his removal.

After attorneys sued on Abrego Garcia’s behalf, a district court judge in Maryland, the state in which he was detained, ordered the government to facilitate his return.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It'll go on Trump's permanent record.....which will prevent him from......well it won't prevent him from doing anything

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Or the court can nominate project to enact their will.

We're putting together a team...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Facilitate, with no staff cause of DOGE.

load more comments
view more: next ›