this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
242 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

7179 readers
246 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Older millennials, adults aged 35 to 44, had debt-to-disposable income ratios around 250 per cent in 2019, while Freestone noted that metric was roughly 150 per cent for the same age group in 1999.

Can confirm we're sitting around 250% but this is after exercising significant restraint to not take on as much mortgage as the banks would have given us. Everyone I know who bought over the last couple of years went all out and I can't imagine them being any lower than 300-350%.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

It isn't just mortgages. I read just a few days ago that the average price of a new car in Canada is $66k. I'm not sure I've spent that much on all of my vehicles combined since I bought my first car at 17. Add in other things bought on financing – lots of our friends have travel trailers, ATVs, and such.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People where I live regularly sell trucks on FB for 60-80K, and they are used with 100,000 km on them

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bidding up used cars during covid was peak bubble behavior

Work trucks costing what a start home used to cost a decade ago

I guess with at truck you work AND live in it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read just a few days ago that the average price of a new car in Canada is $66k.

And a good used bike is $150.

People, we need to start looking for alternatives that won't make rich people richer. Buy a *used *car if you must have a car, but don't keep filling the pockets of these greedy bastards by buying new.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm super into urbanism and love my bike, but unless there's good bike infrastructure in your area, you're risking your life. I know and keep riding anyways but most people aren't willing to take that risk. What we need to do is organize to push our governments to provide safe infrastructure for all road users.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm super confused, why is everyone bringing up such ridiculous car prices? Both Canada and the US have cheaper cars too. For example a KIA Rio (5 door) is around $17-23k new in Canada. It's $16k in the US.

Are Americans only considering massive SUVs when they talk about new car prices?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

You are talking about least expensive, they were talking about average.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Where are you getting $17K from? According to Kia's website, they start at $19,933. And that's pretty much the cheapest new car in Canada. That's way out of reach for many people, and the used market is insane.

Earlier this year, my 2005 Civic with 301,000km was totaled. I bought it in 2013 for $5,000 with 121,000km. From my research, if I had sold it before it was totalled, I probably could have gotten more than $5,000 for it, even with the extra decade and 180,000km.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many Rios do you see on the road for every F-150?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I see a RAM for every 2 F-150s. πŸ₯²

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't forget the cost of insurance, maintenance, fuel, etc. According to TechAltar it costs about half a million euros to own something like a VW Golf at the low end, 1.5M euros on the higher end. It's estimated that the average person spends 30-40% of their lifetime income on their car.

People only see the initial purchase price (which is often ignored because of various deferred payment offers that further increases the price), and the price of gas. Gas alone is starting to reach the price of renting an apartment, yet somehow people still can't see themselves living without a car.

Insane.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is it really that expensive to own a car outside of the U.S.? That seems absurd

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

It's that expensive to own a car everywhere. In Canada, it's projected to be >$1K/mo (CAA has a calculator if you want to project your own costs).

The US is no better.

The craziest part, as TechAltar points out in that video, is that society as a whole subsidizes car ownership and if owners actual saw the whole cost through registration fees and gas taxes, that cost would probably be 50% higher.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is absurd because those numbers are nonsense. There's a spreadsheet linked in the video description.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Some people have good incomes, but cannot anymore changes houses every 5 years because it's out of control, for the price and interest rates, so they use their income to buy cars/RV.

Also some are leasing even if it's like 800$/month just to show their car, I know people who lease big Volvo, Porsche, etc.

Me I keep my 10yo Sonata, and if it dies/crashes, I don't think I'll be able to buy anything more than 15k :-/ What's available for 15k ? a 2006 Sunfire?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh look, things are getting worse again. I'm just numb to it at this point, it's all I've ever really known.

[–] ElBarto 11 points 1 year ago

I'm already in so much physical pain, might as well lump economic pain in there as well...

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is actually a choice. The rich have decided that millennials will suffer so they don't have to. We outnumber them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

(Seriously sorry for dumb question) What does that mean for us?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Depends on where you are financially. If you have a fixed rate mortgage that is getting renewed in the next year or two - you'll see a big jump in payments if you aren't able to extend your mortgage.

If you're still on variable, no real change.

If you're renting, rents will continue to climb if interest rates go up or plateau - but don't ever expect prices to come back down, if you're lucky they'll stagnate for a year but that's unlikely because landlords are greedy shits.

Businesses are cutting jobs as there's less money in the market (all going to shelter and food plus general Greed of making less people do the same/more as a larger group), so if you're unfortunate enough to have a mortgage that's renewing soon and you lose your job and EI can't cover the difference, you'll probably have to sell or lose your home... And still be unable to afford rent.

This has been the goal of every level of government for a while, municipalities refused density, provinces refused to prioritize any public housing (Doug in Ontario is sitting on 22 Billion as education, healthcare, and housing are floundering, so he gifts developers billions in prime Greenbelt lands for single detached millionaire homes) and the Feds can't really do much with provincial and municipal governments running interference - aside from use their own central banks to get essentially interest free loans and build federal public housing. Which they should but certainly aren't.

Oh, and the Bank of Canada is crushing developers with interest rates so they're cancelling or pausing projects because they're unprofitable with these interests rates - or they're colluding and holding us over a barrel because our government cannot successfully accomplish anything without overpaying a private business who underpay their workers to do it for them.

If you keep your job and bought a home within your means, it'll be lean times but not impossible to overcome. Don't be afraid to use food banks or anything to keep yourself afloat. Times are tough af and there is little relief on the horizon.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This really helps me understand the situation better. I appreciate the time and thought put into this response. It's times like these I am thankful I didn't overspend. I listened to my parents and bought a house that wasn't flashy but was suitable for my situation. Most people I know did not do that, and I constantly wonder how they are making ends meet. Some of them make less than I do.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

The way I understand it, there are two main implications. First, the higher the debt load, the less people will spend in a rising interest environment. As their (our) mortgage payments go up, we'll spend less on anything else. The larger the effect, the more significant it is for the rest of the economy. Second, the higher the load, the more people will default or sell in a rising interest environment. The consequences of this one are more varied.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everyone lost their fucking minds and went on bidding spree to buy a house, now the chickens are coming home to roost. I doubt government will be bailing any of these "home owners"

They will those provide financial firms with liquidity so bag holders have someone to sell at a loss.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the government has been whispering to banks to extend amortizations on variable mortgages. They could play with amortizations of distressed fixed mortgages too upon renewal. Keep people in their properties, paying only interest?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The banks have started doing "infinity mortgages", in which the lendee only pays the interest and never the principle because of how the interest rats have gone. CTV News did a little primer on infinity mortgages,

When you boil an infinity mortgage down, it sounds like renting since there is no prospect of paying off the principal. Are infinity mortgages here to stay? I don't know, I do know I won't have shocked pickachu face when they stay a fixture of the Canadian mortgage market.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they will do that, maybe it will work. But if they are doing this, i doubt home prices will keep going up. They need low benchmark interest rates to justify current prices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@sadreality @avidamoeba

Kind of hard to blame the victims here when it's not their fault successive Canadian gov'ts failed to stop illegal money coming into Canada in the 90's -- which, once washed through BC casinos, went straight into property purchases that started the housing bubble we're in now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

If we assume people are capable of making rational decisions and participate in a free market, then they absolutely are to blame for taking on ridiculous debt loads. If we assume the opposite, then their actions were the product of the environment. We seem to want to have it both ways. We want people to be free to do whatever they want without (government) intervention when the number's going up. For example people were really opposed to the introduction of the mortgage stess test. On the other hand we want to absolve people from responsibility and defer to the environment when the number is going down and they're suffering post their earlier decisions. "Why didn't someone do something about X, Y or Z which we perceive is the reason of our suffering."

Personally I do think people's actions are a lot more a product of the environment than anything else. If you ask me, most people shouldn't need to participate in asset markets to have a place to live or have income during retirement. They simply can't compete. But many fellow Canadians don't feel this way, especially when the number goes up. And so we are where we are. πŸ₯²

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That is the failing of economics and social theories, that people will think and behave in a rational way. People don't think or act rational all the time. I would argue that for many people, we generally act on feelings and emotions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They did this trick in america in 2000s, Canada mostly avoided that fuxkenin

Looks like they are gonna get y'all now.

Buying into a bubble doesn't make people a victim. Risk was taken and those who were not properly prepared will be fucked.

This is a classic FAFO situation.

With that being said, yeah, big picture all working people getting fucked.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί