Learn to expect the most stupid and evil outcome of any situation from now on and preemptively fight to secure what you deem important in whatever way you can.

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

First Woman: NASA's Promise for Humanity

First Woman: Expanding Our Universe

Here is copies of them if anyone is interested.

This person has them in Spanish as well https://sh.itjust.works/comment/17675694

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago

Thank you sir. Duely downloaded and replicated for further distribution.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Cowards.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

All of them. Afraid of giving anyone an equal playing field, straight afraid of women. Hold everyone down, insecure little men.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

NASA is going down the drain under the new regime. If you're interested in space exploration, shift your gaze over to the ESA or CNSA.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What will happen to the Artemis program? :(

[–] captain_aggravated 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Same thing that was always going to happen to it: It's not gonna fly. It's been canceled or clean sheet restarted at least once by every administration since inception, and frankly that rope has been pretty thoroughly pissed up.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Gods dammit, and after Artemis I was so succesful! I was looking forward to Artemis II... And seeing humans once again on the moon in my lifetime.

I won't get it. Mars is, resource poor. Don't get me wrong; having humanity set foot on another planet would be an amazing achievement, but... Since everything is so profit-driven, why not support a return to the moon!?

There's potentially Helium 3 up there. And the moon has a bunch of surface-minerals.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

The Artemis program never had any legs. The entire thing was being done in the most stupid way possible simply so that NASA could use SLS, a rocket that was completely incapable of actually fulfilling it stated mission. It was like the Apollo missions but without the lander.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

The amount of puss-outs to the fat orange is absolutely boggling

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This anti-DEI measures are completely crazy.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Anti-DEI is just a newfangled way of saying white men only.

[+] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Reaction: mixed.

Why: fruit of a poisoned tree.

Elaboration: you want art promoting good things to be sincere, because if it's not sincere, then it's not promoting anything, like Disney's "kinda diversity-aimed" actions toward Star Wars ; art is sincere when it's not pushed ; when something is promoted by an agency, it's pushed, even if those making decisions and those making said art share the idea, the former give the latter an order and make it their job.

Context\apology: I think the same about Soviet propaganda art, it may be promoting something good sometimes, but that effect of hierarchy can be felt ; or a few recent movies made about the Armenian Genocide, all intended as a political message about, well, leaving said process unfinished and thus are not interesting as art ; or about FOSS propaganda with almost no effect, if someone remembers those videos about Linux Mint and those FOSS bloggers like Nixie Pixel, that kinda stuff.

[–] 5gruel@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

What are you on about?

[–] theluckyone@discuss.online 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You come across as having an ugly agenda yourself.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Which specifically would that be? Surely you can explain that if you can evaluate my "agenda" as ugly.

Maybe what I wrote meant literally what I wrote. That an agenda is always ugly. People who want to fix the world via right kinds of propaganda seem to dislike that.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago

If you think this is bad, imagine what it portends for women astronauts.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (13 children)

If we survive this, we really should switch to a matriarchal society.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I'm not against the idea at all, but there are pletny of women in power at the federal level that are absolute dogshit as well.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Yes, merit is overrated. We should just get more of Giorgia Meloni, Alice Weidel and Marine Le Pen. Clearly Europe is on the right track...

[–] spacecadet@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Statistically, women leaders start more wars than men, so a matriarchal society signs us up for more war. The group statistically likely to start less wars is former soldiers, probably because they know the horrors.

Maybe leadership is more “content of character” than a gender issue

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I look to a day when people will not be judged by the bits between their legs, but by the content of their character.

That's the famous quote.

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago

Women being leaders in a patriarchal society will probably behave like leaders in a patriarchal society.

[–] cooperativesrock@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago

One single woman in charge is not a matriarchy.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'd love to live in a society where no particular gender held most positions of power or had more legislative influence.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 70 points 1 week ago (12 children)

What's next? Rename the Artemis program because we can't be flying to the moon under some lady name? Probably change it to Ares, god of war and courage. That's a very manly man name, just as the good lords Jesus and Trump intended.

load more comments (12 replies)

[–] Wutchilli@feddit.org 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where can i read them now? Did anybody downloaded those comics and is willing to share them?

[–] GrumpyDuckling 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have both pdf issues in english and spanish and the audiobook that they made for issue 1 and the .apk for the android app (idk how to get ios apps). I don't know what to do with them yet. The website is available on internet archive, you can read both issues on there. For some reason issue 2 eng/sp .pdf were still on the nasa site if you have the direct link.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250301192918/https://www.nasa.gov/calliefirst/

Edit: Uploaded pdf to libgen (usr:genesis pw:upload) idk why it does that, they should get indexed on the other sites eventually.

https://library.bz/fiction/uploads/B350EFC83F5305367A5CFA57281BF422

https://library.bz/fiction/uploads/D8AB8F29A0A0986403468CDC937A1722

https://library.bz/fiction/uploads/ED10ED2E59E0BD9E69E06B855651CE2B

https://library.bz/fiction/uploads/A1329C346561FB661F143351E2BBB99C

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Varyk 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

people saved them before they were Taken down.

https://nasawatch.com/education/you-can-still-read-nasas-deleted-first-woman-graphic-novels/

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fucking excellent use of our tax dollars right here. Along with scrubbing the Enola Gay n shit.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Soon they will just be pushing women down stairs just for fun. Such MAGAts.

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Naw that might cause miscarriages, can’t be having that!

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I actually think that's their preferred method of abortion. That way they can really get out all the anger in one go.

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 28 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I'm curious: the USA wants to dominate the final frontier, how will they ensure a civilization can thrive without woman in those new settlements?

Anyways, the idea is horrific and stupid, let's hope the US implodes.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I always remember the question for Bill Gates were someone asked him if the Middle East will ever catch up with the rest of the world technology wise. And his answer was basically "no" because you shut out half of your population, holding women down.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

They don't want no women, they want subservient women. Think Handmaid's Tale in space.

load more comments (10 replies)

load more comments