this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
313 points (98.5% liked)

politics

22294 readers
3692 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are we likely to see voter backlash against the ultra-wealthy?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism doesn't hate the working class any more than a lion hates its prey.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or any more than a drug dealer hates their mules.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I prefer Donkeys.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Throughout history the downfall of wealthy oligarchs has almost exclusively been because a few are never happy with what they have.

They push too far and eventually it goes past most people's breaking point.

Billions of years of evolution starts going to work after just a handful of consecutive missed meals. That's a lot stronger than the social contract, especially when dealing with resource hoarders who openly flaut the contract and say "you can't do anything about it".

A large enough mob can do something about almost anything...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

because a few are never happy with what they have.

If they were capable of being happy with what they had they wouldn't be billionaires. If I had $100 million I sure as fuck wouldn't be coming in to work tomorrow.

It's a sickness and people shouldn't be glorifying the mentally ill.

[–] AlecSadler 4 points 3 days ago

This is what I'm hoping for. It just takes Player 2ing a couple of them to strike fear in all of them and simultaneously remind people that we hold the power.

There is no real downside to the unliving of a billionaire. Only upside.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago

Okay, so who's going to stop him? Anyone?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

Oh please. More than half of Americans cheered having a billionaire in charge and while their faces were being eaten they're still going on about how they don't regret their vote.

Let them eat cake here.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

"Could."

It sure looks like Americans do want rich people with political influence considering they just voted for a billionaire promising a cabinet of billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

voter backlash

Aww, liberals still think they're going to fix this by voting. How cute!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

What kind of bullshit level headline is that? The content states the obvious and that is all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The boomerang in question: