this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
145 points (99.3% liked)

politics

21970 readers
4161 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh yes, please do "improve"... With the Starlink priority plans you'll have amazing speeds such as 40-220 Mbps down/8-25 Mbps up 😂😂

They're gonna shit their pants with excitement when they experience these speeds^^

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Don’t forget the latency and QoS that’ll probably be done haphazardly limiting everyone to just a sliver of the total available bandwidth.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 46 minutes ago

How the fuck does one of the biggest governments in the world with access to a top tier it department think the upgrade is starlink and not another fibre cable or more access points. Whatever the problem starlink for a city building is not the solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 31 minutes ago

Because now Mush gets to monitor all that is done and said digitally in the whole government

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because unlike fiber, which you can install and reasonably expect to work with minimal maintenance or other costs for years, Starlink has a guaranteed revenue stream by way of planned obsolescence. We will be constantly launching satellites to keep up replacement of the ones that are deorbitted, and that cost will naturally be passed on to the taxpayer.

Not that fiber installs aren't also a grift. After all, how many times has the American taxpayer paid for rural broadband?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

Starlink is the purest definition of "space junk."

[–] Helvetica 2 points 35 minutes ago

Because trump wants to reward leon for his servitude and contributions with a huge ass government contract.

Starlink is free the first month, but after that it's 19,999,999.00 a month. Data theft is a free bonus.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

Grifters gonna grift

[–] [email protected] 72 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because Musk has mad conflicts of interest

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago

A laundry list

[–] ThanksObama 19 points 5 hours ago

That's just the new direct line to our great comrade Putties poot.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"Are you suggesting I don't understand Wi-Fi?", US Press secretary... Probably

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

Ominous voice: "She doesn't."

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

They have zero idea. It's bidirectional satellite, and not low-latency, so...ELON SAID SO

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, it's decently low latency. Around 40ms or so. That doesn't make it useful for them though. There's absolutely no -legitimate- reason for it in the white house. As for illegitimate reasons, why could Musk possibly want a connection inside the white house that has no oversight other than his own...?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

60+Ms at a minimum is not low latency. What are you on about? I have 10ms from coast to coast on residential fiber.

Government installs which were previously on fiber are being switched to this bullshit. Fiber international interconnect to Australia right now is 13ms from DC to Sydney. Big fucking difference.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

15,700+km from DC to Sydney, which is 52+ms at light speed....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

It might depend on location and congestion, but usually it is under 25ms on average.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

Like his semen he spreads his companies everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

It’s in series for rubes.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago

It's a good backup internet service to avoid BIFF. But it reads like they are piping in internet from a datacenter, so just using starlink as an ISP.

Why? $$$. I bet the whitehouse spends a lot on internet.

Also, it's probably really easy to perform traffic inspection using starlink vs an established, regulated ISP.