This is disbarment worthy
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
85 points (98.9% liked)
ChatGPT
1479 readers
4 users here now
A community to discuss about ChatGPT and AI. Not affiliated with OpenAI.
Rules:
-
NSFW must be marked as such
-
No porn
-
Don't be toxic
-
jailbreaks are allowed for now at least
-
No trashposts.
-
Keep the memes to a minimum
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Seriously. Only 5k? After doubling down on the lie? They should never work in law again.
If it was intentional and they knew it was bogus, sure. But without looking at the details, I'm guessing they asked ChatGPT for case references and didn't fact check their results. Negligent, yes, but apparently not to the level to require disbarment.
See the video linked above.
The initial use of ChatGPT was negligent, but they subsequently attempted to cover up what they did and lied to the judge, so, pretty terrible overall
Absolutely too small of a punishment
These guys did 0 work in fact checking a system that is known to hallucinate
"Oh, we're so sorry! We just couldn't imagine a tool created to make shit up would actually make shit up instead of quoting verbatim ]judicial precedent/case law/whatever jargon]! Also we accidentally lied and unintentionally refused to perform our actual roles as required by, y'know, normal procedure and/or law like a real law firm with real lawyers in it. Whoopsy! Totally cool, though, right?"