this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
245 points (94.9% liked)

politics

21724 readers
3928 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

"We wouldn't be in this mess if we'd have won the election — and we didn't," Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the "worst possible business executive" and praised the Wall Street Journal's editorial criticizing Trump's tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump's false claims about immigrants.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 minutes ago

Instead of frittering away the last few months of his presidential term, Biden should have just resigned and allowed Harris to take over his role. She could have pivoted way to the left without having to undermine Biden's agenda and that would have really sent a clearer message to the democratic base.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

The voters deserve a lot of blame here.

You can lead a horse to water....

Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect, and no single candidate is going to align 100% with your stance. Demanding that they do, or else you'll vote for literally the worst possible option, or sit out, or vote a "protest" vote, all so that someone, somewhere will "learn" something is just fucking childish and stupid. And this will be continue to be true no matter how many times the Tone Police show up to admonish people about blaming voters. Sorry, not sorry: I blame the voters.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

I agree, I'm also happy that people like Walz seem to want to give people a better option, making a protest vote even less appealing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 41 minutes ago

Defeated Democratic candidate: accepts responsibility in the lightest possible way

Liberal fanboy: Noooo, it's not your fault, it's the children who were wrong!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 46 minutes ago

I blame the voters.

It means you never have to listen or change in any way, so of course you do.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 17 minutes ago

Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect

The best I can do is fall for blatant Russian propaganda and then get mad when someone calls me out on it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 hour ago

There's no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it's been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let's get this over with.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 hours ago

DNCs fault for blocking Bernie

[–] [email protected] 81 points 5 hours ago (8 children)

Nope. This is on Biden. It's his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they'd spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn't get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn't stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn't really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just "chosen"). Harris didn't try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago

Warning bells started going off in my head the moment that the Democrats announced that Harris was going to be the candidate after Biden dropped out, not because I thought she was an unqualified candidate but because there was no time taken to search for other candidates. Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people's opinions actually mattered. Biden dropping out was huge (at least to me) because it felt like an acknowledgement of the voters who had consistently felt like they were held hostage for their votes because the alternative was a fascist.

It doesn't help either that they went on to repeatedly shoot themselves in the feet while chasing moderate Republican votes, getting other prominent Democrats to chastise certain classes of voters and breeding the same voter apathy that hurt them in 2016, and their refusal to acknowledge that what's happening in Gaza is a genocide that we shouldn't help Israel perpetrate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Putting trump in jail would've made America look bad. Oh, the irony.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Harris made choices. She could have chosen not to adopt every single one of Bidens policies. What was biden going to do, fire her? If you look back at her presidential run she really struggled to articulate any policies back then too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

This is on anyone who was within arms reach of Trump in the last decade and didn't take matters into their own hands.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

It's on Biden and Garland for not throwing Trump in prison the second his term ended.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Amen. 4 years to build a case? January 6th, spend 6-12 months and file charges. What the fuck were they doing for 4 years?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 48 minutes ago

Running out the clock.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly, and it's the third time we've been betrayed like this.

Not going after the Bush administration.

Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

Not going after Trump.

Three times, they've had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they've consistently fucked it up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

It's not really a fuck up when they did it deliberately. Their priorities are in the wrong place because it's an oligarchy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'd like to add:

Not going after the Confederate states

to this list

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Or at least the second the supreme court said whatever the president does is legal as long as it's an "official act".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A cascade of failures. Beyond Joe not man enough GTFO, the DNC once again anointed a letter instead of letting the public decide. yes, Joe should never have run for a second term. Given that he did, he should have dropped out sooner. Given that he didn't, the DNC should have had an open convention rather than putting their thumbs on the scale in back room deals.

Tim is 100% right that we would not be in this mess if they had won, but when is the DNC going to stop trying to manipulate everything and lie to us about it? They are to blame as much as Repugnacans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

Because they and R are same team. I bet it's like lawyers who viciously go after each other in court, them have golf and martinis on weekends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They probably realised Harris wasn't going to win due to the amount of prejudice and thought Biden had a better chance against trump (who they'd have guessed would have been axed after his loss and criminality, but it was a cult), but then they let Biden to abdicate because there was truth in the criticism of him and the media ran with it..

At that point who else could they run? It was bad planning, not accounting for Biden's age/health and the cult of trump.

Also they should have given Bernie his shot. They didn't want real change and it's been forced on them anyway, but now to the detriment of all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Biden made an appropriate decision to back out. He should have done it much sooner. But I'm not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden's fault. I don't really feel that's fair.

Harris' main draw was that she didn't want to do anything, which pissed off progressives. She was pro-establishment and pro-status quo. She didn't need Biden's help to not get votes... I have no love for Biden, but the truth is the truth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 45 minutes ago

But I’m not sure I would characterize the failings of Harris/Walz as Biden’s fault.

Inasmuch as they ran as a continuation of his policy, I'd say there's some blame to be had.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I mean the worst Walz did personally was maybe his performance against JD, but that's pretty small compared to a lot of other errors that can be attributed to the collective campaign decisions and DNC as a whole. And yes, Biden. And really, 2020 and 2016. Actually fuck it, compared to all the butterfly effect possibilities, Walz is such a small part of why we're in this mess, lol. I still want the 2000 supreme court to support the Florida recount that actually says Gore won.

Still, kudos for taking responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

I wouldn't place any of it on Walz, this is all about Harris/Biden. He did well in his debate, he was obviously more progressive than Harris and was pretty much just reined in.

I think if the ticket had been reversed, they'd have won. The center wasn't ready for a black woman to start with, and when she was just parroting the same party line re: Gaza, and cozying up to fucking Cheney's, for crying out loud, it turned off the progressives that might have voted.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago

Fucking finally. A Democrat we we can respect, because they don't rely on their role inthe damage.

load more comments
view more: next ›