this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
160 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21652 readers
4011 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No time like the present to call your Senators and ask them to vote No on cloture for the continuing resolution until the Musk/Trump administration stops their lawbreaking

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] santa 76 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Any D needs to vote no. Republicans control all three branches. They own any shutdown. Seems like it is already shutdown. Fucking Johnson gaslighting Ds telling them they need to do the responsible thing. They can eat me.

[–] WoodScientist 38 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

As much as shutting the government down will hurt, it's preferable to letting lawlessness go unchecked. DOGE is planning on massive illegal cuts to social services. So putting off pain now will just lead to more pain later. Democrats need to hold the line and not vote for any continuing resolution without hefty strings attached reigning in the administration's lawless behavior.

For God's sake, Trump is illegally deporting people and planning openly political prosecutions. I would prefer the government completely closed down to one run by literal Nazis.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It’s not going to hurt any less than what they’re doing nowadays with the government “working”. Hell, might even be better. ICE will stop getting their paychecks, too.

Of course, that all assumes that eel-on-musk didn’t get one of his wish.com wünderkinds to install a backdoor in the fucking treasury department a few weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Do we know that DOGE will be affected at all by a shutdown?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

The best argument I've heard against Dems filibustering the CR is that a filibuster would mean that they would - in the eyes of the public - take responsibility for the shutdown, and that the public would blame them for EVERYTHING wrong with the country now, including all of the Trump/Musk messes.

Which is insane to me. Allowing the CR to go through would cause much more direct harm, show that the Dems don't really care about opposing this insanity, and - if we're worried about PR - allow the GOP to blame future problems on Biden since they're marketing the CR as a continuation of Biden's budget when it's really nothing of the sort.

This is precisely the time to use the filibuster. If the GOP wants to remove it, let them. They'll own it, and if the Dems ever get back into power, it'll help them tremendously.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

"The president is, through Elon Musk and DOGE, trying to illegally seize the power of the purse from Congress by unilaterally shutting down programs that congress funded and Americans rely on. If we don't use every tool available to us to protect the separation of powers, we would be in violation of the oaths we swore to protect and defend the constitution."

Thats all they should need to say. This is a pretty black and white situation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

It's not all they need to say. They need to expound upon it at great length in a traditional (real) filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They need to hear their constituents saying it to have a backbone

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

precisely, they need to hear from us. thanks for posting!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago

The best argument I’ve heard against Dems filibustering the CR is that a filibuster would mean that they would - in the eyes of the public - take responsibility for the shutdown, and that the public would blame them for EVERYTHING wrong with the country now, including all of the Trump/Musk messes.

This plays right into the GOP's (and especially Johnson's) hands, because that's the exact narrative they're trying to push. "Despite the fact that we control literally every branch of government and the Democrats have no leverage, it's completely the Democrats' fault if the government shuts down."

They're going to do it anyway, regardless of if you vote for or against the CR. Republicans don't take responsibility. That's a rule carried over from the McConnell era. Blame everything on Democrats. Push the narrative hard, and eventually the base will believe it.

Democrats would just need to respond with "This CR would enable DOGE to continue their illegal and unconstitutional gutting of social safety net programs and firings of federal employees en masse. The government employees that would be affected by a government shutdown are also the same employees that are most vulnerable to being fired on the whims of Donald Trump and/or Elon Musk anyway. Democrats cannot vote in favor of a continuing resolution without also validating the GOP's continued illegal and unconstitutional purge of our government employees and social safety net programs. Republicans are in control of all branches of government. If they want to continue down this destructive path, they have the ability to do so without a single Democrat vote, and that is what they will have to do."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

Whatever. They're cowards. Just more lip service

[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Marsha Marsha Marsha doesn’t answer her phone and send backs generic form responses.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Same for Fetterman.

I’m ashamed to have had his bumper sticker.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No politician deserves bumper space.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

Depends what you mean by "bumper space." I can think of a few I could accept some dents for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

She is a worthless bag of hair.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

Don’t insult hair like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Have you called your reps, friend? Skepticism is fine. Inaction is unacceptable at this time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have called my Republican House representative and my states two Democratic senators. They seem flooded, so I had to leave a message with each, but we'll see.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

TY! I appreciate it! Mine seemed flooded with calls, too. They need to know what we want, if we are to have even the smallest hope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

They've all been flooded ever since the Musk/Trump administration started their crime spree