this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
332 points (99.4% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

3323 readers
134 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 114 points 1 week ago (5 children)

One of the 237 that didn't wear life jacket un-drowned or found a jacket during drowning?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

One guy needed two

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

Number 237 drowned without lifejacket but wasn't a person.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

237 people swam in the lake without a life jacket. 236 of them drowned.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

And 0 people swam in the lake with a life jacket! What an unsuccessful sign!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That guy? ~~Albert Einstein~~ Michael Phelps.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, someone put a life jacket on a dead body and threw it inside the lake and it came back to life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

99.578% of people that swim there drown.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same as that riddle about people coming back from the moon

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And the fresh diminutive footwear

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait where’s the extra one come from?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

Didn't read the sign, probably drowning without a life jacket to this day

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It could be you! ⛈️

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Must have drowned in a different lake

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

If you're going to go swimming at Crystal Lake, I feel like drowning is the least of your troubles.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I mean the vast majority of people swimming don't where life jackets.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Especially the ones who drown.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd like to make that point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Well, how was it un-typical?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Generally in lakes it's more people boating who drown. They are far from shore and can get hurt in a capsize easily

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also having potentially lot of clothing on, making it harder to swim

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

And also drunk as fuuuuuck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I feel like pointing out some info that was not known to me at the time it would've really been helpful and not knowing it almost lead to my death by drowning as a child: when trying to swim, (some?) shoes can act like "anti-flippers" by increasing the difficulty of moving your feet as quickly and staying afloat past what one might usually be used to and so swimming is really hard. I think it's because water is pulling against the bottom of the shoe, sort of, at least that's how it felt. I was like 5-10 yo in a lake and almost drowned before I got to the dock I was swimming to. Another problem was that no one noticed I had gone under and was having trouble getting air. Overall it was traumatic and really probably preventable in several ways, including by not wearing shoes while trying to swim in water, which was my original point.

Edit: although a life jacket would've fixed it too

[–] LazerFX 2 points 1 week ago

I've never free-swam, but when I was a kid (up to early teens, maybe 14?) I had swimming lessons. I was always told the lessons of the waterways, which I vaguely remember now, but one of them was kick off your shoes because they will kill you. We had to recite those back at the start and end of the lessons, what to do if you fell in. Kick off your shoes because they will kill you.

Only lesson I remember, funnily enough.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There life jackets. There castle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

“Why are you talking like that?”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm embarrassed to confess, but I also don't wear a life jacket when I swim. Hell, most of the time I prefer to leave the swim suit behind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is drowning naked more or less embarrassing than just regular drowning?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure. I haven't drowned yet. I'll let you know.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of Kern river, but the undertow kills people wearing life vests too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Schroedinger's lifejacket.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Hrmmm... who wants to be FIRST!? 🥇🏆

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or, they only collect the dead ones from the surface. There's probably a veritable mountain of lifejacketless corpses on the silt.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You must've misread the sign. All the casualties were without lifejacket.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Clearly because the floating corpses were being carried away by birds, so only the sunken ones were left to be found!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can float on water if I lay on my back..

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm.. Do you weigh the same as a duck?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about very small rocks?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Or big metallic ships