this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
6 points (65.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37704 readers
1018 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is that just bicurious? (I’m asking in general, not as myself because I’m bi for sure.)

I know people probably ask this a lot but I genuinely want to know now.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheEschatonSucks 6 points 1 day ago

Heterosexual bi-romantic

[–] earphone843 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you know people like this? Dating someone you're not romantically interested in is basically just being friends.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do, she wants to date women but can’t find any that attract her

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is probably not at all what this person is like, but the way I read this made me picture someone desperate to prove that they’re cool and hip by being part of the LGBTQIA+ community. I have never heard of anyone like this, though I have heard of someone very European claiming to be native American for the street cred so I wouldn’t say no one would ever do the same with sexuality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

It's a thing. And like it's kinda awkward because sometimes these people actually are queer. It's a somewhat common experience for trans people and ace people to feel like we're queer before we figure out how.

But also you've got folks like the political lesbian movement, a thing that happened during the heyday of 2nd wave feminism where a bunch of straight and asexual women redefined lesbian as a rejection of men, began entering lesbian spaces and relationships and started getting really mad at us for "acting like men" [TL: expressing sexual attraction to women]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

One of my friends states that she is very rude to them and that she thinks the LGBT community is “cute”, so I don’t know

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago
[–] otp 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you aren't attracted to them but you want to date them, what would you end up doing that you wouldn't do with a friend?

  • Be in an exclusive relationship that doesn't involve sexual activity?
  • Get jealous if they hang out with or say they love anyone else?
  • Engage in sexual activity but not enjoy it?
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not the OP, but their question was pretty much describing me.

For me, it's about intimacy. I value intimacy. Hugging, kissing, touching, holding hands, sharing moments, laying on the couch together watching TV etc. Those are things that I don't do with my friends, and aren't things that I'm looking for from my friends.

Asexual folk have developed language that talks about the way they navigate similar situations. Sex averse, sex neutral and sex positive. So even though I'm not ace, the terms apply in a similar way to my relationships. Using these terms, I would describe myself as sex neutral. Which is to say that I don't seek it out, and I don't miss it. Yet, it's also a very strong form of intimacy, which I value a great deal, and as an expression of intimacy, it's very much something I'm happy to share with my partner.

[–] otp 1 points 1 day ago

That makes sense. I'm not sure if OP understands what they want and didn't clarify it in the post, or if they still need to figure that out for themself

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Said person just finds women hot but wouldn’t get jealous nor have sex

[–] otp 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's the desire to date women, then?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have no idea, it’s either because she finds women aesthetically pleasing or she thinks finding a woman pretty = being attracted to women even though “I can’t find women that attract me” contradicts being into women.

I have another friend who could imagine dating a woman and also didn’t find them attractive. She was straight.

[–] otp 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have another friend who could imagine dating a woman and also didn’t find them attractive. She was straight.

I could imagine being a bumblebee, but that doesn't mean I have any intention of transforming into one or anything! Haha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s very true!!

Honestly, with the friend example, she can imagine dating women, but it doesn’t mean she would/likes them that way. She’s still straight. Plus, it’s very rare to be 100% attracted to one gender anyway, but sexuality is a spectrum, and it’s still straight.

I’m a lesbian sexually. I haven’t tried sex with a man. I can imagine doing it, but I’ve only felt sexually attracted to my girlfriend, who’s obviously a woman. Despite being a lesbian, it doesn’t mean I’m 100% only sexually attracted to women and can’t even imagine doing it with a dude. It’s a fluid spectrum that changes over time.

And the other girl who this post is about may be like our friend (Mine and hers). She can imagine dating women and wouldn’t object (because it’s rare to be 100% attracted to only one gender), but since she can’t find a woman who attracts her and only men give her a spark, she might be straight, bicurious, or at least biromantic heterosexual. Still, in order to be biromantic/bisexual, you have to feel romantic or sexual attraction to both genders, and what she said contradicts that, as she seems to feel romantic and sexual attraction towards the opposite gender. (Straight)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Probably heterosexual, biromantic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know people who date folks they're not attracted to... that said, you can be homoromantic, heteroromantic, etc. Romantic and sexual attraction can be different.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What if this person is sexually attracted to only men and can’t find romantic or sexual attraction towards women and just wants to? (It’s not me it’s someone I know)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s called being straight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That makes sense. She only talks about how hot men are and how she wants a boyfriend. She only can name male crushes and gushes over male musicians and actors. She finds women pretty and wants to feel towards women how she does towards men but can’t find any that make her feel that way. She can’t name any women crushes shes had ever and she’s mainly indifferent towards women as a partner.

So maybe straight, maybe straight + biromantic, no clue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Ok that description sounds more like straight but wishes she wasn't. I see that one around somewhat frequently, especially in progressive feminist spaces

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I think this person is confused tbh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If they genuinely have neither romantic nor sexual attraction to any women, just wishing they did, I'd call it "wanting to fit in/wanting to belong with a specific group" (in this case lesbian/bi groups/people), having no connection at all to one's sexual orientation. Just a characteristic of humans social nature.

Or being traumatized by men or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

"It's not me it's someone I know" reads like "it's a cylinder" 😅

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Okay if she thinks she would like to but can't find anyone who fits the bill then there is still a chance it wouldn't work even if she does eventually find someone. So yes I would call that bicurious but it could very well be straight with a kink. Sometimes telling apart which things only work as a fantasy isn't easy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's pretty much me. I don't really have a name for it. I just call myself queer, or sometimes panromantic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You like men but would be interested in dating women although they don’t attract you right now or…?

That’s pretty cool though :3

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm panromantic, but attracted to men, however I only date women and gender diverse folk on that end of the gender spectrum. My partner is a woman :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Ooooohhhh!! That’s awesome!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Personally, I’m kind of the inverse. I’m romantically attracted to both genders and while I can find attractive men, I wouldn’t be interested in dating one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

homoindifferent?