this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
70 points (96.1% liked)

Games

36009 readers
787 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly everybody loved the open-city Arkham games and Spider-Man, and nearly everybody loved playing a stealth archer in Skyrim.

Get the fucking peanut butter in the chocolate and let me be Oliver Queen already.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because Warner Brothers owns the rights to all DC games right now and nobody at Warner has any idea how to actually produce good video games. The Arkham games were good because they came out before loot boxes and online-only games were a thing. Now if a game doesn't earn a billion dollars in the first year, the game is considered a failure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

WB have made MK boring

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly, I think the market is so saturated with superhero media (movies, games, tv shows) that anything that's not at the top is at the bottom. I kinda know that Green Arrow is a superhero just from what I've heard and seen in other superhero stuff, but that's about it. Most people that aren't really into the superhero genre won't bat an eye unless they market it as the next best AAA game, and then if it falls short of that it's a bust.

Edit: it may be better off as an indie-style, lower budget game that the fans can get into without the producers having to risk a whole lot, but with the whole Marvel/DC stuff they seem to have huge budgets and bigger profit expectations.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

While I'm sure it could be a great game, it'll never happen. WB just canceled a Wonder Woman game and shut down its developer. If they don't have faith on a game based on one of their most well known characters, there's no way they'd even green light a game based on a lower tier hero. A detective game based on the Question would be great too, but since he's not one of DC's top heroes it'll never happen.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mr Zaslav, the CEO of WB, the company who owns the rights, doesn't want WB to be profitable so he can sell it off to a private equity firm and make out like a bandit with his CEO bonus intact

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

How does that stack up, lower the value to sell? Shareholders approve his bonus, why would they want to lower their value.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

At first I came in here to say it was a silly idea, but almost every argument against it could be thrown against other games that have been done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It would have to be very short to be any good I think. And have a really good story.

But yeah just unlock different arrow types throughout the game and you're good. Half finished.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Add a Sniper Elite like xray slow mo for when you hit enemies with a long range shot or ricochet so you can appreciate breaking the pelvis of a mentally ill man with a boxing glove arrow after aiming for his balls.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yes! You get what I'm looking for exactly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It could be so fun, arrows that act as parachutes, grappling hooks, etc. Punching glove arrows