this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1248 points (99.3% liked)

Greentext

5282 readers
1379 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Guilty Canadian Admission:

In my teens I lived in Brockville Ontario near Ogdensburg New York and watched a lot of US channels. The Star Spangled Banner came on at the beginning of the broadcast day for some channels.

For many years, I thought the first line was "Jose can you see"

[–] sanpedropeddler 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When I was a kid I thought the "for which it stands" in the national anthem was in reference to a country called "witchistan", which was presumably full of witches.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

That's what you voted for. You want republican rule taking away your freedoms. Well now you Floridains have what you wanted and voted for. Don't be mad you made your bed and dont like the sheets.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Given how close most elections are and the low turnout, I would say at least 40% of voters and 50% of the population didn't vote for this without even having to look at the election results.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In fact, 77% of the USA population did not vote for this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 day ago (23 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Every YouTuber sponsored by nordvpn: 🤑🤑🤑

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is pretense to intrude on other things and more importantly remove the ability to browse pornography anonymously, which is dangerous. I would never use an account to browse a porn site because why would I ever want that data linked back to me? Look at the government right now. You watch a gay or trans porn video and in a few years that could be grounds for never being able to have certain types of jobs or worse, being deemed a “miscreant”

If this was truly about protecting children they would encourage open dialogue on sex in homes and increase inclusive sex education. This is evidence based. It would still be necessary even with this nonsense because obviously vpns exist, as well as amateur run sites, sites run from outside of the USA, torrents, etc that don’t give a shit about us laws requiring age verification and will show all kinds of obscenely hardcore videos

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Make sure you cum on your ID first as tribute.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Will porn be the straw that broke the mountain's back?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No because there are a million different websites that just don't follow these rules. All this does is dissuade people who are both clueless about where to find porn and not particularly determined.

It also won't make a difference when basically every major social media website is a softcore porn website. I feel like conservatives opened their crusade by targeting thotfluencers they would have had a lot of momentum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like conservatives opened their crusade by targeting thotfluencers they would have had a lot of momentum.

They did. Under the hashtag ThotAudit, after one thotfluencer said something that could be interpreted as her not paying taxes on the money she was making showing her bits online.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Prohibition but worse

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 125 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Soon they’ll start recording you jerking it to cross reference with previous sessions as identity confirmation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 days ago (9 children)

"Verification is carried out by 3rd party". Totally no potential to misuse of collected data.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why no, they specifically mentioned it being highly secure

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 days ago (10 children)

At least they owned the liberals, right?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is a great opportunity to learn how to use a VPN! I'm in a blue state so haven't needed one yet, but the time is definitely coming.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You are free to be as conservative as you want. What more can you ask for?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

you're free to be as conservative as the heritage foundation wants you to be.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May he enjoy the sweet freedom of USA!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mindbleach 86 points 2 days ago (33 children)

I don't care if kids see porn.

If that's the worst thing ever, justifying this invasion of privacy, whoop de shit. Let 'em.

There's a lot worse on the internet. There's a lot worse on daytime television. Blood and guts and cults and informercials. Desirable crude entertainment is obviously not worth locking down the internet. I mean for fuck's sake, at least with "four horsemen" excuses, like terrorism and money laundering, people agree that those things are bad.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago

It's absolutely reprehensible that you think it's okay for a child to see an infomercial

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Florida 🤝 UK

Ridiculous and archaic anti-porn laws

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago

People with humiliation fetishes are gonna love this shit.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›