this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
126 points (96.3% liked)

politics

20365 readers
3247 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s wild the Christian religion is generally about love and tolerance (if you read the Bible), but the actual practitioners are some of the worst fuckers in American society

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

the Christian religion is generally about love and tolerance (if you read the Bible)

No, if you read the Bible you’ll see a vengeful, genocidal, jealous, petulant god who’s very ok with slavery and rape. Not much love and tolerance there.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As a Christian, I can honestly say I'm appalled at literally everything the current administration is doing. We're called to love others, not to judge them. There is a huge difference in saying you're Christian and behaving as one.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You really don't know very much (or want to admit) about the history of Christianity do you

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

They loved those heretics when they burned them alive.

[–] boydster 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

That's not the same thing as the teachings of the NT though. I'm not saying Christianity is without fault at all here, but saying the message is equivalent to the behavior of zealots from another age is kind of silly

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You talking Old or New Testament? Because most of the arguments people seem to have with Christianity (from my experience, at least) come from OT rules/etc that became obsolete due to Jesus.

Unless you're talking more modern history...?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you grew your church at the tip of a spear, and at the sharp end of a sword. you made demons during the inquisitions. you made partners with the nazis. christians. don't make me fucking laugh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So you're talking more modern history. I don't agree with the way Christianity has been forced on people throughout history. I don't condone the inquisitions, etc.

It saddens me, honestly, at how far from true Christianty most publically open "Christians" are. Forcing your beliefs on others, ridiculing those who don't believe the same as you, and not treating all of humanity with the respect and love the deserve are not actions of a true believer in Christ.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I pose to you all those evil things are CENTRAL to the actions of a true believer in Christ, as they've proven to be, for the last 1700 years, that any fantasy about love, forgiveness, acceptance and peace is the fairy tale Christians tell themselves while they're forcefully decimating anyone that doesn't believe what they do

[–] Leg 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like to point out that one of the first lessons the Bible teaches the reader is one of hierarchy and inherent supremacy over others. Eve is lesser to Adam, as all women should be to all men. Man is the dominator of the land, bending nature to his whims. All men are to worship a supreme being because he's bigger, stronger, more powerful, and these are respected traits held by any authority. It's baked into the values that some of us should be supreme to others, and the inherent violence of this philosophy can be used to justify wars and genocide, as has happened time and again.

Christianity is only good if you use confirmation bias to pick out the parts you like, but the whole text creates drones and fascists by design. I believe in God, but I would never in my life subscribe to Christian beliefs (not even getting into the open hostility the church has held against my particular section of belief throughout history that persists to this day).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's worse than that. The first lesson is that God created Adam and Eve without the knowledge of good and evil. Then Satan tricked Eve into eating the fruit. She didn't know better until after she ate it, nor did Adam. But God punished her and Adam for doing something when they didn't know any better. So the lesson is that God is arbitrary and can change the rules on you at any time if he feels like fucking with you. And you are expected to say "Thank you Sir, may I have another?" It very much reinforces the view that the deity is a petulant child and we're his ant farm. And yeah, the hierarchical view and the idea of God as the Big Alpha Male in the Sky is part of it too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd like to add that God, being omnipotent, knew they'd break the "rules," and went ahead punishing them just the same. Seems to me like the punishment was the point all along.

Very love. Wow.

[–] the_crotch 1 points 2 weeks ago

the lesson is that God is arbitrary and can change the rules on you at any time if he feels like fucking with you. And you are expected to say "Thank you Sir, may I have another?"

Checks out if you define "God" as "the universe, time, all of existence". Probably one of the more useful and realistic lessons in the old testament.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I agree that basically all religion is bad, but for what it's worth, in the story Eve knows she shouldn't eat the fruit, and she isn't tricked, she's tempted. Those are different things. It doesn't make god any less of a jerk, but mistakes like that can sometimes make people disregard a whole argument because they think you don't know what you're talking about.

[–] BrundleFly2077 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No true scotch egg or some shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Let's talk about the behavior of self-identified Christians. Start from that. And there are some life-denying, antihuman parts in the NT too, just look at some of the Epistles. Paul (or at least whoever wrote the two Timothy epistles) was one nasty piece of work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Jesus explicitly said He was not making any rules obsolete.
What He did was tell and show that OT laws are supposed to be read from the perspective that they are meant to help and protect the weak and "lesser".
And the OT is a history of God's love for humanity as much as the NT.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was thinking more about the things such as animal sacrifices and temple rituals, which were law prior to Jesus. But he did say he came to fulfill the Law, thereby making those practices obsolete since He became the ultimate sacrifice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

There was actually a dispute among the early Christians about whether or not they were still subject to the Law. James, the brother of Jesus, who led the church in Jerusalem took the view that Christians should still follow it. St Paul, for whatever his motives might be (Josephus speculated that Paul was an agent of the Jewish elders whose job was to detach the Christians from the Jews, in hopes the whole thing would fizzle out), held the view that the Law was fulfilled and also that Christianity was open to Gentiles.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] boydster 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's pre-Jesus stuff though. You can find faults in the New Testament too but this thread is seriously missing the point I think

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not all of them. There are a few sects that are far worse than the others.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So is he going to eradicate himself? Because he's basically the antichrist...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

How dare you talk about God Emperor rump like that! Straight to Guantanamo!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He's off to a bad start; announcements like that only serve to increase anti-Christian bias, mine included.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see no statements from Muslim communities who helped him to grab this presidency. I would like to know their reaction to this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

If you’re trying to root out antichristian behavior, you might start with the antichrist himself.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Too bad they won't address all the "Christians" that make it their mission to live drunk on cruelty and schaudenfreude.

If being Christian has anything to do with honoring and following the tenets of Jesus of Nazareth as written in the New Testament, there isn't a single Christian in the Republican party.

They use Jesus like a mask or totem to be on "I win morality" base while almost exclusively advocating inhuman atrocities like destroying families and doing the opposite of everything in their supposed own book they've clearly never read.

It's not like they try but fall short either. This isn't no true Scotsman, all they do is hate. When is the last time you've seen a Republican express love for anyone that wasn't rooted in angering (hating) their innumerable enemies? Is Jesus not love?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

They don't believe in good or bad acts. They believe in good or bad people. Good people do good things. Bad people do bad things. They believe in Jesus, so they must be good. You don't, so you must be bad. Now any action against you in justified, cause they do good and you do bad and bad must be stopped by good. Doesn't matter what you're doing, and doesn't matter what they do to you. The morality has already been established.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

It’s “Antichristian bias”. In other words, bias against the Antichrist.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Does this mean I can potentially create an organization that has the goals of flipping over tables that sell stuff at churches?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He also chased the money-changers out of the temple with a whip. Make sure to include that part too.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 8 points 2 weeks ago

Good luck with that, fuckos.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody expects the American inquisition

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

If you remove the anti, all you’re left with is the pro.

By design in this case. 250 years of a lie lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is all totally normal. I'm sure the Democrats will convene a committee to write a white paper about it or something...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is just a pivot for his blame game. People are finding out that immigrants, gays and DEI aren't the problem so he needs new fall guy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

totally sane.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

DOGE will shut it down, right?

...

Right?

load more comments
view more: next ›