this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
9 points (90.9% liked)

Art & Design

295 readers
1 users here now

🇬🇧 This is a bilingual community on a french instance.

Total subscribers:

🇬🇧 Let's discuss art and design!

Join us and

This community is about art in all its form, as well as its influence on culture and its application at the service of society: architecture, music, literature, performances, video games, graphic design...

Check the pinned posts for basic rules and a (wip) list of art related communities 🔗

🇫🇷 Discutons d'art et de design !

Vous pouvez ici :

Le sujet de la communauté concerne toutes les formes d'art, ainsi que leur influence sur la culture et leur application au service de la société : architecture, musique, littérature, performances, jeux vidéos, design graphique...

Pour toute question, suggestion, réclamation, etc. N'hésitez pas à utiliser le sujet épinglé.

✅ Les règles de l'instance s'appliquent bien évidemment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Relevant articles:

The AI boom is creating a new logo trend: the swirling hexagon. AI companies seem to have taken a page from crypto when it comes to logo design.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90869029/ai-boom-logo-trend-swirling-hexagon

Why DeepSeek’s logo represents a new era of AI branding. The friendly whale might be just the design disruptor the artificial intelligence industry needs.

https://www.fastcompany.com/91268357/deepseek-logo

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I agree there's a lot of design repetition throughout the AI logo ecosystem. It's almost as if the leadership of these companies did something asinine like use AI to generate a new logo, which would guarantee that they all look similar. But that would be stupid, right? And CEOs aren't stupid, lazy, and tight-fisted, right?

However, I'm not here to speculate about how useless CEOs are, or whether of you put a bunch of morons in a room together, they unsurprisingly make moronic decisions, or whether any executives reading this will huff and puff about how they aren't useless leeches making decisions about a business involving technology they don't understand. No, I'm here to quibble about terminology.

Hexagons are, indeed, the bestagons. However, few of these logos in this graphic are hexagons, and most don't even resemble hexagons.

  1. ... is. Vaguely, but technically, yes.
  2. is a circle. Maybe a Möbius strip, but not a hexagon.
  3. Is an octagon
  4. Is another Möbius strip circle
  5. Is another circle. You might argue that it could be a dodecagon, because it has 12 leaves, but again: not a hexagon.
  6. Finally, a true, unambiguous hexagon.
  7. Another hexagon!
  8. A circle (or maybe an octagon), stealing the styling of #7. However, the void center does form a hexagon, so I'll count it - even though the void center of 6 is a circle.
  9. Another true hexagon. Now we're rolling! Containing a circle made from the stroke design in #6, and containing yet another circle.
  10. My favorite. Not only a hexagon on the outside and inside, but offset by 60°
  11. Breaks the run. Back to circles, this time containing a square. Nothing hexa- about it.
  12. A circle, containing a circle. There are 6 segments in the stroke also used by #6 and #9, but it's still not a hexagon; just unoriginal.
  13. Another circular Möbius strip, although the interior does form a hexagon.

Observations:

  • They really missed their chance at some symmetry at a neat dozen, which is at least related to hexagons by being a multiple of 6, by having 13 logos (excluding DeepSeek).
  • Of 13 logos, a smidge over half (7) have a hexagon in them somewhere; 2 of those are because of the shape of the empty space at the center of the logo, so fewer than half of the logos (5) are actually hexagonal in shape.
  • More logos (9) contain elements of circles than contain elements of hexagons.
  • Möbius strips show up a few times
  • Several (7) use a 6-segment, 2-strand, vaguely Celtic braid

There is a fantastic amount of re-use of style in these.

The first logo is actually either 3 interlocking ovals, or two interlocked distorted triangles (with hidden bends); it's interesting, topologically.

Hexagons do recur, but the title:

new logo trend: the swirling hexagon

is inaccurate as over half the logos contain no hexagonal elements. They all do tend to swirl, and most are symmetric. It's have been more accurate to say "the swirling circle", or "the celtic knot".

It's hard to believe that most of these weren't generated by AI; few are actually unique (#5) and share almost no element of another.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fantastic analysis, thanks for your contribution!

I feel like fastcompany used hexagon for a lack of better word, I would have settled on concentric swirl or something similarly generic and able to describe all those logos

[–] mat@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago

I learnt something (maybe I will forget it in the next hour, but nice read). Thanks