this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
342 points (94.3% liked)

Open Source

32368 readers
748 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

he's probably right. the company wants to be disruptive, and it's normal for any company to steal data. you can self host the current model, but that doesn't mean this will always be the case. certainly they will want to make a profit at some point. it's day 1 silicon valley shit

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect the enshittification of proton is fast approaching.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Im stuck. Is there a Guide for a fast approaching full suit switch?

Caleneder, Passwords, Email, Drive?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Email and calendar: Tuta, Posteo, Mailbox.org, Disroot

Passwords: Bitwarden, KeepassXC

Drive: Filen.io

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

many services will not accept email addresses that are not Gmail or protonmail or outlook etc. I don't know what you would use

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

@ReakDuck Well Nextcloud I guess but they only offer an email client so you can connect an existing email account

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

1978 US Automotive Companies: If we make a product that locks our customers in, they'll be our customers forever!

1978 Japanese Automotive Companies: The US gave us their required parameters. If we make a product that works then customers will keep buying our stuff.

2025 US Tech Companies: If we make our products contingent on proprietary software and hardware, we'll lock them in.

2025 Chinese Tech Companies: The US gave us their required parameters. If we make a product that works and they can utilize freely, they'll keep buying our stuff.

Not our first rodeo.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

this is obviously talking about their web app, which most people will be using. In this special instance, it was clearly not the LLM itself censoring the Tiananmen Square, but a layer on top.

i have not bothered downloading and asking deepseek about Tiananmen Square. so i cannot know what the model would have generated. however, it is possible that certain biasses are trained into any model.

i am pretty sure, this blog is aimed at the average user. while i wouldn't trust any LLM company with my data, i certainly wouldn't want the chinese government to have them. anyone that knows how to use (ollama)[https://github.com/ollama/ollama] should know these telemetry data don't apply to running locally. but for sure, pointing it out in the blog would help.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

@ToxicWaste @JOMusic the censorship is trained into the ollama models too. But of course the self-hosted model cannot send anything to China, so at least the whole tracking issue is avoided.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I want to preface this question by saying that I'm not trolling and I'm not defending Proton. I'm genuinely confused at the reaction to this article.

I'm also upset with Proton's recent comments, specifically the December tweet and subsequent responses, and I'm evaluating my use of Proton.

Near as I can tell, this article (which I did read) lays out the facts about Deepseek as an LLM originating in China and the implications of that.

Why is this article a reason to pile on proton?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

Proton had a reputation for being the good guy. In the span of a month, we saw them bend the knee, flip flop and throw shade at competition; all while pretending to be the hero. We essentially have to trust them with our data and they are showing signs that they are willing to act against that trust with worrisome agendas and biases. It's not a good look, and since this marketing to users key issues, it's going to cause some responses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

The reason a very small subset of users love it*

All the downloads making it the top app in the app stores are from people using their centralized service. The people behind these downloads have no clue that you can run it locally or can even start to understand what that would even mean. It is this usage the article is addressing.

Like the thread starter, I am also confused to why this in particular draws so much hate.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Goddammit I had such high hopes for Proton. Was planning on that being my post-Google main. Now what. 💀

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I've been happy with Fastmail for 10 years, though they're Australian and not European. Might look into a European alternative at some point but so far I've had no reason to switch.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 minutes ago

I've heard of Startmail being an alternative, it's based in the Netherlands but it's quite expensive ($7/month) and it's owned by an adtech company (System1)

[–] yourFanatic 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tutanota and Mailfence have a free tier.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

At this point I'm this 🤏 close to ~~hosting my own email~~ abandoning it all and living in a cabin in yhe woods

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Man, I wish self hosted email was a reasonable thing to do. But it's a pain to set up the server and the domain stuff, and once you do, if anyone ever spammed off that IP, you're probably screwed anyway because good luck getting off the blacklists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Anything European-based to recommend? I'd like something as far-removed from America as possible, respecting GDPR, privacy, etc., but with a good-sized free-tier storage. I don't think I need more than a couple GB for email. Calendar included would be a big plus as well. 😅 Probably asking for a lot here...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Tutanota is gdpr but only 1GB free storage. They do offer calendar for free as well with open sourced apps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Thanks! I saw Tuta from the previous comment and thought 1 GB is a bit on the small side, kind of like Proton. But not too expensive to go up a tier either. 👍

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I use Infomaniak Mail or ikmail for short. They give you 20GB free, have a whole suite (calendar and others), and are Swiss based. It can also link to other mail clients under the free tier. Only hurdle is using a VPN or proxy for initial sign up, but that can be turned off for daily usage.

[–] breadcat 1 points 20 hours ago

honestly probably worth paying for for something if it means enough to you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Jesus fuckin Christ, just marry Trump at this point, Mister proton CEO.

[–] yourFanatic 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I cancelled my Proton renewal for January and am very happy with Mullvad VPN.

Mozilla VPN runs Mullvad under the hood as well.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 162 points 1 day ago (26 children)

Pretty rich coming from Proton, who shoved a LLM into their mail client mere months ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

they were also caught praising a nazi party so thats that too

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] AlecSadler 25 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Since ditching Proton for Tuta and Mailbox...I haven't missed anything and I'm saving money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I got a proton vpn subscription a while ago and they upgraded me to unlimited for the same price. So I think I'm paying like $6.25/month for an unlimited plan. I feel like it's too good to leave. If I do tuta's plan that's $3, then another $4 for simplelogin, and $5 for mullvad. So that's $12 a month if I leave my plan.

[–] AlecSadler 2 points 22 hours ago

I get it, and please, you do you. There's no issue.

I'd just add that I can save money using Amazon, but I try to avoid it when I can. I'll pay a little extra when I can, for the greater good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 day ago (14 children)

DeepSeek is open source, meaning you can modify code(new window) on your own app to create an independent — and more secure — version. This has led some to hope that a more privacy-friendly version of DeepSeek could be developed. However, using DeepSeek in its current form — as it exists today, hosted in China — comes with serious risks for anyone concerned about their most sensitive, private information.

Any model trained or operated on DeepSeek’s servers is still subject to Chinese data laws, meaning that the Chinese government can demand access at any time.

What???? Whoever wrote this sounds like he has 0 understanding of how it works. There is no "more privacy-friendly version" that could be developed, the models are already out and you can run the entire model 100% locally. That's as privacy-friendly as it gets.

"Any model trained or operated on DeepSeek's servers are still subject to Chinese data laws"

Operated, yes. Trained, no. The model is MIT licensed, China has nothing on you when you run it yourself. I expect better from a company whose whole business is on privacy.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

People got flack for saying Proton is the CIA, Proton is NSA, Proton is a joint five-eyes country intelligence operation despite the convenient timing of their formation and lots of other things.

Maybe they're not, maybe their CEO is just acting this way.

But consider for a moment if they were. IF they were then all of this would make more sense. The CIA/NSA/etc have a vested interest in discrediting and attacking Chinese technology they have no ability to spy or gather data through. The CIA/NSA could also for example see a point to throwing in publicly with Trump as part of a larger agreed upon push with the tech companies towards reactionary politics, towards what many call fascism or fascism-ish.

My mind is not made up. It's kind of unknowable. I think they're suspicious enough to be wary of trusting them but there's no smoking gun, yet there wasn't a smoking gun that CryptoAG was a CIA cut-out until some unauthorized leaks nearly a half century after they gained control and use of it. We know they have an interest in subverting encryption, in going fishing among "interesting" targets who might seek to use privacy-conscious services and among dissidents outside the west they may wish to vet and recruit.

True privacy advocates should not be throwing in with the agenda of any regime or bloc, especially those who so trample human and privacy rights as that of the US and co. They should be roundly suspicious of all power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

In other words, honeypot. And an US plant in Switzerland...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How apt, just yesterday I put together an evidenced summary of the CEOs recent absurd comments. Why are Proton so keen to throw away so much good will people had invested in them?!


This is what the CEO posting as u/Proton_Team stated in a response on r/ProtonMail:

Here is our official response, also available on the Mastodon post in the screenshot:

Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation.

Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.

At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.

By working on the front lines of many policy issues, we have seen the shift between Dems and Republicans over the past decade first hand.

Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost.

Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

Source: https://archive.ph/quYyb

To call out the important bits:

  1. He refers to it as the "official response"
  2. Indicates that JD Vance is on their side just because he attended an event that other invited senators didn't
  3. Rattles on about "corporate Dems" with incredible bias
  4. States "Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses" which is immediately refuted by every response

That was posted in ther/ProtonMail sub where the majority of the event took place: https://old.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i1zjgn/so_that_happened/m7ahrlm/

However be aware that the CEO posting as u/Proton_Team kept editing his comments so I wouldn't trust the current state of it. Plus the proton team/subreddit mods deleted a ton of discussion they didn't like. Therefore this archive link captured the day after might show more but not all: https://web.archive.org/web/20250116060727/https://old.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i1zjgn/so_that_happened/m7ahrlm/

Some statements were made on Mastodon but these are subsequently deleted, but they're capture by an archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20250115165213/https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

I learned about it from an r/privacy thread but true to their reputation the mods there also went on a deletion spree and removed the entire post: https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1i210jg/protonmail_supporting_the_party_that_killed/

This archive link might show more but I've not checked: https://web.archive.org/web/20250115193443/https://old.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1i210jg/protonmail_supporting_the_party_that_killed/

There's also this lemmy discussion from the day after but by that point the Proton team had fully kicked in their censorship so I don't know how much people were aware of (apologies I don't know how to make a generic lemmy link) https://feddit.uk/post/22741653

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Indicates that JD Vance is on their side just because he attended an event that other invited senators didn’t

🤣

Show up at an event = my best friend and definitely not a leopard ready to eat my face ???

🤔

(What a dumbass)

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

What a fucking dumbass. Yes, dems suck. But at least Lina Khan was head of the FTC and starting to change how antitrust laws are enforced. Did he delete this post after Trump was inaugurated with 3 of the richest tech billionaires?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Lisa Khan is a hero. This is quite twisted "logic": this party sucks, so let's side with Hitler instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›