Open Source

32368 readers

807 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

340

Proton's biased article on Deepseek (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] yourFanatic 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I cancelled my Proton renewal for January and am very happy with Mullvad VPN.

Mozilla VPN runs Mullvad under the hood as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I remember mullvad has less servers than proton and I hear they get blacklisted often. Have you encountered anything like this?

[–] yourFanatic 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I've been "blocked by network security" on reddit. Switching to the next server resolves the issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Does Mullvad have "Secure Core" option like Proton does? I'm kinda thinking about switching.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

I think maybe Multihop is the Mullvad equivalent?