this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
618 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

61774 readers
3854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI Summary:

Tesla's 2024 financial results were disappointing, with several key points highlighted:

  • Automotive Revenues: Fell by 8% in Q4 2024 compared to Q4 2023, totaling $19.8 billion.
  • Energy and Storage Revenues: More than doubled, growing by 113% to $3 billion in Q4 2024.
  • Services: Grew by 31% in Q4 2024, contributing $2.8 billion.
  • Total Revenue: Increased by 2% in Q4 2024, but income fell by 23%, with an operating margin of 6.2%.
  • Net Profits: Dropped by 71% to $2.3 billion in Q4 2024.
  • Annual Performance: Automotive revenues decreased by 6% to $77 billion in 2024. Energy generation and storage increased by 67% to $10 billion. Services grew by 27%, bringing in $10.5 billion.
  • Gross Profits: Fell by 1%, with net profits dropping by 53% to $7.1 billion for the year.
  • Free Cash Flow: Decreased by 18% to $3.6 billion.
  • Regulatory Credits: $2.8 billion of profit came from selling regulatory credits, not from core business activities.
  • Future Predictions: Tesla expects energy storage revenues to grow by at least 50% year-over-year and aims to grow automotive sales by more than 60% in 2025.

Despite the poor financial results, Tesla's share price increased by 103% over the same period.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pika 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

it's ok, the president will make some rediculous executive order like "all federal vehicles must be tesla", then do no price haggling or something and it'll pull him right out of that bind.

Sadly I don't think I'm joking.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People don't want Swasticars? Huh.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

You know you fucked up when you made it so people hear nazi car and think of your company and not the car company founded by the nazi government

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Ah so only the unverifiable services that don't require an easily trackable commodity did well.

I wish I could make up income too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2069436850145993

50 States, 50 Protests, 1day

Feb 5 @ your downtown.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Credits aside, these dont seem like bad numbers when compared to spend/investment. Tesla management got what they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 173 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Value investing is basically dead, isn't it? Am I crazy? How can you objectively evaluate a company's value, notice it is undervalued, and then trade accordingly when price action does not even slightly track the company's value?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Value investing is basically dead, isn't it?

You're looking at a too short time frame. The famous tulip bubble lasted for a decade, too.

[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The investors are banking on Elon looting the Govt coffers into Tesla. I can’t deny the chances based on the other crap we are seeing.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exclusive contracts at 20% mark up. Can’t wait for all police vehicles to switch over to teslas.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd support that: the new excuses as to why a suspect escaped would be fantastic.

"Well, I would have caught him but my car died for some reason and I couldn't get out."

"Well, I would have caught him but I hit a bump and half my car fell off."

"Well, I would have caught him, but my car caught fire and killed my partner."

"Well, I would haved caught him but it was raining so my bumper fell off and punctured my tire."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

True enough. A bet on any tech stocks right now is probably safe on that basis - but I expect they really do plan to crash the stock market at some point... It would make sense if you wanted to consolidate ownership cheaply.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Value investing isn't dead. There are tons of value investors, and they aren't the ones buying Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (9 children)

My point is, if this is how markets react to worsening sales and an actually insane CEO how can you trust a rational bet to pay off?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

How does the first exclude the second? That's like saying: how can I trust train travel if F1 cars drive 300km/h. They're different things.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Corkyskog 91 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

So more than a third of their net profits come from selling credits they received from the government? Am I understanding that correctly?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yes you are understanding that correctly. For producing EVs, they get credits from the federal government. I don't know the exchange rate -- e.g., how many EVs per credit.

Then, Tesla turns around and sells these credits to buyers, usually other companies. Companies buy these credits from Tesla to comply with regulations requiring certain environmental outcomes, and credits count towards these outcomes.

In theory this type of program incentivizes and rewards companies who invest in the technology(is) tied to these credits, in this case EVs. In practice it's a way for other companies to comply with renewables regulations without actually doing anything to meaningfully reduce their impact and footprint (other than buying credits)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They are emissions credits. Every company receives some amount of "CO2 emission credits" from the government. These allow you to emit a certain amount of carbon dioxide. If you don't emit all the CO2 that your credits allow, you can sell those credits to other companies that need more than the government gives them.

The idea is to put a total limit on the amount of emissions in the country, while letting the market figure out where it makes most sense economically to invest in emission reduction.

Tesla makes only EV cars and so it doesn't need all the credits a typical gasoline car company would receive. So they sell them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You are. Without the EV credits, Tesla would have folded years ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If any other company dropped net profits by 71% they’d be firing their CEOs (well giving them a golden parachute to gtfo) and having some major shake ups.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Good thing musky got that big compensation package shoved through, eh?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 week ago

The CEO is too busy playing social media edgelord. I guess when you blow up a company to the point where it will pop, you have to go into politics to change the laws to make it more profitable.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

https://fortune.com/2025/01/29/tesla-shares-rally-2025-earnings-growth/

Tesla shares rally on pledge to return to growth in 2025

Continuing the bullshit from 2022, where Musk promised a typical year would have growth of 50!!

Tesla plans to launch its autonomous ride-hailing service in Austin in June

Hows that going Elron?

“This is not some far off mythical situation,” Musk said on the company’s call with analysts. “It’s literally five months away.”

So it's been LITERALLY running for more than a half year now? Or is it still a no show, like the 7 previous years FSD should have been here?

We can do this TODAY.

He has said that so many times, on so many things, and it's always a lie. FSD, Convoys of trucks that are cheaper than trains! Tesla being able to park. which it still can't do reliably. And this is the very beginning of the claim that a Tesla can drive across the country (USA) to pick you up!

Did ANYONE believe his bullshit ever, do people believe he will build a manned base on Mars eventually? A base that should have been up and running I think it was 2022!!!

How is this man not in jail?

Oh right, probably much the same way Trump is not in jail. USA is an oligarchy moving towards a fascist dictatorship!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I believed him at first, why wouldn't I? Self driving was starting to take shape, the demos looked good, I assumed what he was saying was legitimate.

I remember starting to question things around the time of the Tesla Semi reveal. It didn't make sense to me that you'd use heavy, short range batteries in an industry that runs by driving as far as possible, for as cheap as possible, hauling as much as possible. There were just too many compromises and he didn't give any details other than acceleration (who cares in trucking).

After that I started looking into him more and realized his bullshit spread through everything he touched. I honestly think most people are simply not paying attention to him, they just read headlines and since headlines never call him out and only amp up the crazy ambitious things he says, people believe he's a genius.

That seems to be slowly changing as he opens his stupid mouth about politics, but he's pivoting to a new audience now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I believed him at first, why wouldn’t I?

Admittedly so did I. 😋
I agree the Truck convoy claim to be cheaper than trains were so obviously bullshit, I was beginning to get on to him by that time, but if I wasn't sure before that, I definitely agree at that time it became obvious that he is a fraud.

headlines never call him out and only amp up the crazy ambitious things he says, people believe he’s a genius.

Absolutely, it's so bad much of the media are essentially complicit.

That seems to be slowly changing
Here it's changing fast, it may be tomato - tomato, but some claim Tesla is still the best option, despite all the bullshit.
But we recently had a report on how Tesla had record high failure rate on mandatory safety checks after 4 years here in Denmark. So maybe that will detract from the "best option" bullshit.
Tesla claims to have cheaper servicing, but if the cars aren't legally road worthy, when adhering to manufacturer service recommendations, that's just another bullshit claim.

I've seen reviews where they point out cheaper maintenance of Tesla as a HUGE advantage, making them cheapest car to own in their category. This has annoyed me a little, because I'm a little bit in love with the Skoda Enyaq, but it cost about twice in maintenance than a Tesla Y. Well maybe there's a reason for that, and it doesn't annoy me anymore. Because if you follow recommendations for the Skoda it's actually maintained, the Tesla is not. The same for all other VW family cars, they are a bit expensive to maintain, but I've NEVER heard about problems like with Tesla on safety on any VW-group car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, but you've forgotten the real money maker.

  • Having full control over the regulatory authority that currently prevents him putting his automated deathtrap taxis on the roads

Turns out it's much cheaper to buy governments than it is to perfect self driving technology.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He probably needs all the H1B visas for his remote taxi drivers. I doubt the latency would be good enough otherwise. And it was clear in the 'demo' the pilot was just standing right there controlling it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I doubt latency would be an issue.

More the fact that they'll be juggling too many at once.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Yeah but then it’s not teslas fault. That employee didn’t do their job and can be fired

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That’s ok, I’m sure a big government bailout is on the horizon for JUST the struggling, American EV auto maker, because their CEO sucked the president’s dick the best.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Expensive luxury cars for rich people with over 30 thousand subsidy, and they will still lose money. Credits is the new Bitcoin.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Net Profits: Dropped by 71% to $2.3 billion in Q4 2024.

Since when 2.4 billion net profit is terrible?

"Yes, we earned billions but it's actually less than the year before!" Dude, go out and touch some grass...

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (7 children)

"Terrible" is just for attention, but the bit of news that would have cratered any other company's stock it that it's down 71% YOY. Plus:

Regulatory Credits: $2.8 billion of profit came from selling regulatory credits, not from core business activities.

People in the current administration have said they plan to end these credits in the coming months. Without them in 2024 Tesla would have reported a $500million loss for the year.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›