this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
294 points (74.5% liked)

Firefox

18426 readers
11 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Almost all the links in my front homepage are sponsored now. What's next, a few ads in the bookmark bar? How about when I enter a URL, I then have to type "McDonald's" before I can actually navigate there?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I don't mind as those are easy to switch off.

[–] [email protected] 283 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These can be turned off. Not great that they’re on by default, but you gotta pay the bills somehow right?

[–] [email protected] 181 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yeah, this is basically the least offensive thing possible that ensures the lights stay on.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Remember when most sites had simple banner ads, and there was no widespread outcry about how much they sucked and we needed ad blocking software? Then they started flashing, then the popups and pop-unders came, then vids started autoplaying, and now here we are.

If advertisers hadn't gotten greedier than banners on the sides of sites, maybe no one would've gotten around to blocking all their shit.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Pop-under ads were obnoxious. As were the popups that were like 1 pixel large but it still had the windows bordering around it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think the downvoters can’t hold these two thoughts in their mind at the same time:

  1. Firefox is the best browser.
  2. Firefox has serious problems because Mozilla is a terrible steward of it.
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

Firefox is the best browser

It's only real competitors, in my eyes, are Firefox forks.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 33 points 1 week ago

Agreed. I love Firefox and don't really like Mozilla.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

No it's the complaint about one of the few transparent revenue flows Mozilla managed to pull off.

It's disabled one step deep on the settings

There is a shitload of stuff going wrong with the Mozilla foundation and this doesn't even make the top 10.

That's the reason for my down vote: it's nothing I want this community to focus on. It's basically engagement bait with the topic "ads bad".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 week ago (10 children)

This has been the case for several years. Super easy to turn them off

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago (16 children)

See ads, "how dare they" Sees paid version, "how dare they" Development costs time and money, pick your poison.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just turn it off. If they don't have income they don't exist.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Mozilla already has Scrooge McDuck amounts of money. It doesn’t need any more to maintain a browser and an email client.

From jwz, who founded Mozilla & Firefox:

.

Mozilla had a duty to preserve the open web.

Instead they cosplayed as a startup, chasing product dreams of "growth hacking", with Google's ad money as their stand-in for a VC-funding firehose, with absolutely predictable and tragic results.

And those dreams of growth and market penetration failed catastrophically anyway.

(Except for the C-suite, who made out quite well. And Google, who got exactly what they paid for: a decade of antitrust-prosecution insurance. It was never about ad revenue. The on-paper existence of Firefox as a hypothetical competitor kept the Federal wolves at bay, and that's all Google cared about.)


Now hear me out, but What If...? browser development was in the hands of some kind of nonprofit organization?

As I have said many times:

In my humble but correct opinion, Mozilla should be doing two things and two things only:

  1. Building THE reference implementation web browser, and
  2. Being a jugular-snapping attack dog on standards committees.
  3. There is no 3.
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Mozilla already has Scrooge McDuck amounts of money

no. they don't.

the google money that they rely too heavily on, may not always be there. they need more diverse funding. these paid placements, which can be turned off, are one way to do that.

turn off and delete the sponsored stuff at install, never see 'em again. it's not like they're microsoft or something, constantly turning that kind of shit back on with every-other-update.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stevedice 57 points 1 week ago

Skill issue 1000017516

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The browser itself is free, and they have to make money somehow to keep the company running (if the CEO didn't keep most of it for themself). If you don't like it, you can turn it off or download an ad-free fork.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

Better than the unlabeled sponsorship behind the default search engine.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they make some money from harmless icons, I mean, I can live with it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago

Yeah but you can literally just turn this off with no fuss.

1.Firefox for Android.

2.Tap the menu button.

3.Tap. Settings.

4.Tap Homepage.

5.Deselect Sponsored shortcuts under Shortcuts.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

This was a bug

And looks like it's been fixed :)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Or, ya know, literally any other browser that's not a fork of Firefox.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup, you can turn it off.

It's not overly difficult to get to the setting either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If we want software to be FOSS we have to stop bitching so much about developers trying to make the math work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So how exactly were you planning on them making money if they don’t take money from Google to be the default search engine and they don’t take money to place advertisements on the default home page?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I say let them cook a little, they arent drowning in donations and still do a tone of things for foss communities.

Let's remember that the de fuckto market (ie pleb) alternative is overwhelmingly Chrome.

We dont need such projects just so we as individuals can have privacy focused experiences but also for how that influences markets and society. And to have any influence you need certain power of masses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The perplexing thing is that unlike Thunderbird, I have never seen them ask for donations

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

They had a very successful donations drive a while back. They might still be good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Be that as it may we are old enough to know foss needs support.

I myself rarely click on some campaign for donations, I prefer the coffee button or whatever they have on their page or bithub.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Either that or they go bankrupt. Design your own browser and give it out for free if you don't like it

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›