this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
549 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19829 readers
3725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has the lowest approval rating of any newly elected U.S. president since World War II, except for himself in 2017.

While his immigration policies and government downsizing have support, controversial moves—like ending birthright citizenship and renaming the Gulf of Mexico—face strong opposition.

Economic concerns, particularly rising prices, remain a major issue for voters.

Analysts say Trump’s popularity will likely hinge on broader economic and immigration policies, with potential political consequences for Republicans in the 2026 elections.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

Ah yeah, double think

Winning the popular vote is being unpopular

Winning the election is losing the election

Not voting for Trump is voting for Trump

War is peace

Freedom is slavery

There are not 4 lights, but 5 lights

The stunlock continues and intensifies

[–] [email protected] 148 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Maybe some of those people who he's not popular with should have fucking voted.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But … the last guy who was not even on the ballot is as old as Trump. And eggs are expensive. And another country is waging war, sorry, gEnOcIdE. And Kamala sounds foreign and I don’t know what she would do because I prefer to revel in ignorance instead of finding out myself.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I agree that there is genocide happening. I also understand that the guy who got elected is actively in favor of it and wouldn't lift a finger to stop it if everyone in the country begged him, while the person who lost was trying to balance millions of conflicting priorities (and sadly those dying are not the top priorities) and the result isn't what I want. There are other things to consider after you realize you're not going to get what you want.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. The GOP hold all three branches of government and will do whatever he tells them to do.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fun thing about the GOP is that they are all rats waiting for the ship to sink. The minute they see that trump is weaker/unpopular among their base, they'll jump ship and try to sell him out

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know how viable that actually is, a decade of Trump flags and Trump shirts and Trump merchandise, and decades of Trump branding everywhere before that. The Trump cult is in too deep.

The GOP winners will probably be the ones that poach the Trump brand as "we are Trump's chosen ones to carry out Trump's vision for America", until his cultural significance wanes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And yet he still got re-elected. We are the dumbest nation comprised of the most idiotic people to ever exist in history.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The fact that he isnt even less popular than his last election scares me. The guy has proven himself time and time again in the spotlight to be evil, moronic, really any negative adjective you can think of, and he still has supporters. More, even. How? *

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the thing people are most upset about is renaming the Gulf. What in the absolute fuck?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trans people are attempting to flee the country fearing for their lives

...and the thing people care about is the fucking Gulf of Mexico getting renamed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree 15 points 1 week ago

Because people in this country have the memory of a fucking goldfish. I'm sure it's going to drop hard in a week.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So he’s more popular this time than last time

Why?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because information literacy is at an all time low, and people are easily swayed by propaganda on their doom rectangles.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And this time, the entire digital media complex is on his side: Facebook, Google, Twitter, Apple, Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Because the electorate is about 51% morons and self-interested people willing to let the country burn for tax cuts that will only benefit about 5% of them.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Least popular, but not unpopular enough to vote against.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

He's the only President to never reach 50% approval, yet he's been elected twice.

That's all the evidence you need to know that our election system is broken.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

The fact that even if all the non-voters voted for a mix of third parties, it would still net the same result under this system, tells you all you need to know about FPTP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

People really hate women presidential candidates apparently.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

That must be it. No other lesson to be learnt.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Lol no. Studies have been done about this. The average voter doesn't give five shits if the candidate is a man or a woman.

3 chances at guessing what the average voter cares about.

Hint: it's not gender policies, pronouns or social culture wars

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When the average voter doesn't give a damn either way while someone else cares deeply, but only in one direction, it makes the minority the most important demographic.

Let's say you have a choice between "A" and "1", and 98% of people don't care. But 2 percent care deeply and will vote based on the superiority of "A", while nobody votes based on their support of "1."

All else being equal, if one pay ignores the issue while the other adopts the platform of "A is great, and 1 is bad", the latter party will win the election.

That's how the GOP wins elections. They target single-issue voters: Gun nuts. Pro-lifers. Racists. Christian Nationalists. Relatively small groups that vote in lockstep without a significant equivalent group on the other side of the issue.

Sure: most people are pro-choice. But how many pro-choice Democrats would have changed their vote if Trump and Harris had opposite positions than reality on those issues but were otherwise identical? I certainly wouldn't have voted for Trump over it. But pro-life voters absolutely will change based on that single issue.

It's why every single time the Dems make that a central issue, they get slaughtered in the general election. Pro-choice Republicans simply don't prioritize the right to choose over everything else, so they keep voting red.

The Republicans are masters of finding and manufacturing single-issue voting groups that will vote against their own interests to achieve a goal the GOP doesn't actually care about.

[–] Tiger 1 points 6 days ago

Brilliant observation, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your people are rock chewing stupid, that’s the big issue

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

As long as you need those "Rock chewing stupid" people to win an election, and you keep thinking of them as such, you will KEEP losing elections

Those "rock chewing stupid" people are LITERALLY American workers. You know, the people that for good or bad keep the country running?

And then democrats have the gall to call themselves the party of the worker man.

Pathetic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Doesn't matter; we are still infected with the donvict cancer.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope his old age makes his life extremely difficult.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Lame duck (maybe), so I don’t think he cares about popularity. He’s pushing out EO’s as fast as he can, and many of them are idiotic.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember a week ago when he had his highest approval rating ever when he took office?

Well, that sure was quick. The goldfish have remembered why we got rid of him in the first place.

[–] Jax 2 points 6 days ago

They really do invoke the thought of a goldfish, don't they?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He was unpopular when voted in...inconsequential reporting

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump about to ban the Telegraph in the US

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›